A team of researchers from Oakland University and Temple University have succeeded in constructing a time-calibrated tree of prokaryotic life, covering 11,784 species of bacteria. Prokaryotes are small, simple, single-celled organisms with no nucleus and membrane-bound organelles. Examples include E. coli and streptococci bacteria. Eukaryotes, on the other hand, are basically any organism that can be seen by the naked eye.
In 2015, Temple University’s Center for Biodiversity director Stephen Blair Hedges published a study contradicting the prevailing model that evolutionary diversification in eukaryotes has been slowing down. And now, by taking advantage of rapid, low-cost sequencing methods afforded by science, they found that prokaryotes share remarkable similarities with the evolutionary patterns of eukaryotes—they’re also expanding at a constant rate.
“We have produced a timetree of most described prokaryote species that has revealed a constant diversification rate, remarkably similar in that respect to eukaryotes and probably resulting from the same mechanism, the random nature of lineage survival over millions of years,” said Hedges.
He also said, “Our results were contrary to the popular alternative model that predicts a slowing down of diversification as niches fill up with species.”
Tracing down the origins of species has long been a major goal in biology. The popular belief is that evolution happens as an adaptation response, triggering speciation and diversification. This finding affirms Hedges’ conclusion in 2015 that the latter is not dependent on adaptation: “This finding shows that speciation is more clock-like than people have thought,” said Hedges. “Taken together, this indicates that speciation and diversification are separate processes from adaptation, responding more to isolation and time. Adaptation is definitely occurring, so this does not disagree with Darwinism. But it goes against the popular idea that adaptation drives speciation, and against the related concept of punctuated equilibrium which associates adaptive change with speciation.”