Amazon Calls for Regulation of Its Own Facial Recognition Tech
The company may be hoping to pen some of the government's ethical standards.
Amazon sells one of the most well-known facial recognition services — but now it’s calling on politicians to develop stronger regulations for the controversial technology.
On Thursday, Amazon Web Services’ Global Public Policy VP Michael Punke published a blog post that outlined several key areas where policy surrounding facial recognition technology, especially when used by police, could be improved. It’s a bold public move that means Amazon is joining other prominent tech companies, especially Microsoft, that have also called for stronger rules about how their own facial recognition systems can be used — suggesting that business leaders are wisening up to how their technology can be abused.
“Over the past several months, we’ve talked to customers, researchers, academics, policymakers, and others to understand how to best balance the benefits of facial recognition with the potential risks,” Punke wrote. “It’s critical that any legislation protect civil rights while also allowing for continued innovation and practical application of the technology.”
Much of the blog post could be read as an attempt to protect Amazon from mounting criticism over its facial recognition service, Rekognition. For instance, each proposed regulation, such as a call for improved transparency among organizations that use facial recognition tech, is followed by a note about how Amazon is already following its own proposals.
Punke’s blog seems to insist again and again that Amazon is really the good guy here — the company just wants to make sure that its technology is used responsibly. In the blog, Punke seeks to discredit recent independent research that found that the system could make significant errors and also propagates racial and gender biases. Punke repeated the company’s official defense — which its own customer has debunked — that the researchers simply used Rekognition wrong.
It’s this self-serving aspect of Amazon’s call for regulation that has drawn criticism from the ACLU.
“Amazon’s framework rings woefully hollow,” ACLU Senior Legislative Counsel Neema Singh Guliani told Vox. She added that the proposal “underscores the company’s refusal to properly address the dangers of its technology in government hands and reinforces the urgent need for Amazon to get out of the surveillance business altogether.”
All the same, Punke is correct to assert that facial recognition software and those who use it should be subject to stronger regulations than they are today.
“New technology should not be banned or condemned because of its potential misuse,” Punke wrote. “Instead, there should be open, honest, and earnest dialogue among all parties involved to ensure that the technology is applied appropriately and is continuously enhanced.”
He has a point; a recent survey found that Americans are fine with facial recognition software just so long as it works and is used responsibly. All the same, those regulations probably shouldn’t be drafted by the same company that makes a killing selling facial recognition tools to the police.
More on Rekognition: Report: Amazon Tried to Sell Facial Recognition Tech to ICE