NASA
Selling the SLS

NASA Begs Companies to Clone Its Super-Expensive Moon Rocket for Cheap

byVictor Tangermann
Oct 27
NASA

Could a private contractor really build the SLS for less than half the cost?

Spending Less Scratch

After spending tens of billions of dollars developing its super-heavy and Moon-bound Space Launch System (SLS), NASA is turning to the private industry to keep the doomed system alive — and for the next 30 years or so.

In a request spotted by Ars Technica, NASA is suggesting a single contractor could take over production, ownership of flight hardware, and operations while also arranging the leasing of the system to other contractors.

NASA proposes that it could remain an “anchor tenant” of the SLS, flying a crew into space once a year using the rocket. So in other words, NASA is committing to using the troubled launch system long term once it’s in the hands of a contractor.

NASA is also suggesting the contractor could produce the rocket at half the price or less compared to the current “baseline per flight cost,” Ars reports — which, although it’s a laudable goal, raises the unavoidable question of why NASA didn’t build a cheaper and more practical rocket in the first place.

Advertisement

Expensive Rocket

Why any private entity would take over production and leasing of the system is somewhat unclear — it’s not exactly a hot deal. The rocket has cost over 30 billion dollars and over a decade to develop.

It’s also an exceedingly expensive way to get astronauts to the Moon. According to 2019 budget estimates, each launch could cost over $2 billion. But we have yet to get a straight answer from NASA as to how much each launch could cost — let alone if a contractor will actually be able to bring down costs per launch.

Unlike SpaceX’s heavy launch system Starship, the SLS is also fully expendable, meaning that none of the components will ever be reused.

As Ars points out, it wouldn’t be the first time NASA tried to offload a launch system. In the 1990s, the agency consolidated Space Shuttle operations under the United Space Alliance, a single contractor.

Advertisement

Is NASA looking for a Hail Mary to ensure a future of its extremely over budget and behind schedule rocket? To many, the industry has already moved on from expensive and expendable rockets.

But given the agency’s existing relations and yearly budget from the government, it’s likely a contractor will come forward sooner rather than later.

READ MORE: NASA wants to buy SLS rockets at half price, fly them into the 2050s [Ars Technica]

More on the SLS: The SLS Is Probably the Last Rocket NASA Will Ever Build

Advertisement


Care about supporting clean energy adoption? Find out how much money (and planet!) you could save by switching to solar power at UnderstandSolar.com. By signing up through this link, Futurism.com may receive a small commission.

Share This Article

Copyright ©, Camden Media Inc All Rights Reserved. See our User Agreement, Privacy Policy and Data Use Policy. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Futurism. Fonts by Typekit and Monotype.