Ineffectual

Sam Bankman-Fried Admits the “Ethics Stuff” Was “Mostly a Front”

Oh god, he admitted it.
Noor Al-Sibai Avatar
In Twitter DMs, FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried appeared to admit that his "effective altruism" bent wasn't as effective or altruistic as one would think.
Image: Craig Barritt/Getty Images for CARE For Special Children

Effecting Change

The disgraced former head of the crypto exchange FTX, Sam Bankman-Fried, built his formidable public persona on the idea that he was a new type of ethical crypto exec. In particular, he was a vocal proponent of “effective altruism” — the vague-but-noble concept of using data to make philanthropic giving as targeted and helpful as possible.

But in a direct message, Vox‘s Kelsey Piper asked Bankman-Fried if the “ethics stuff” had been “mostly a front.”

Bankman-Fried’s reply: “Yeah.”

“I mean that’s not *all* of it,” he wrote. “But it’s a lot.”

Truth Be Told

If the concept of becoming rich to save the world strikes you as iffy, you’re not alone — and it appears that even Bankman-Fried himself knows it.

When Piper observed that Bankman-Fried had been “really good at talking about ethics” while actually playing a game, he responded that he “had to be” because he’d been engaged in “this dumb game we woke Westerners play where we say all the right shibboleths and everyone likes us.”

Next time you’re thinking of investing in crypto, maybe it’s worth taking a moment to wonder whether the person running the next exchange might secretly be thinking the same thing.

More on effective altruism: Elon Musk Hired A Professional Gambler to Manage His Philanthropic Donations

Noor Al-Sibai Avatar

Noor Al-Sibai

Senior Staff Writer

I’m a senior staff writer at Futurism, where my work covers medicine, artificial intelligence and its impact on media and society, NASA and the private space sector.