- A researcher ran a computer simulation to discover what other planets having water might look like in terms of above surface land.
- The results concluded that most habitable planets would be completely or mostly submerged.
A Universe of Waterworlds
The 1995 movie Waterworld is a cinematic masterpiece of schlock dealing with a post-ice caps world that’s nearly completely submerged. The film is exceedingly silly, especially since the premise has absolutely no scientific basis in reality. The complete melting of the ice caps would transform the coastlines of the world, but not to the extent depicted. However, the possibility of habitable planets existing with little to no exposed land is much greater than you may think.
In a study published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, researcher Fergus Simpson, of the University of Barcelona, lays out his findings that any planets found with significant levels of water will most likely be totally, or at least mostly, submerged. The data was collected from running computer simulations that took into account various factors that contribute to water distribution on planets, like erosion.
The universe is incomprehensibly vast and some estimations, like the one made by Berkeley’s Peter Behroozi, say that the odds of there being other life-sustaining planets are pretty good. Behroozi said that for every grain of sand on our planet, there could be ten planets similar to Earth in the universe. Of those planets, Simpson found that most of those planets would have less than ten percent of their land exposed above water.
Even more, the simulations showed that Earth’s ideal mixture of land and sea is an exceedingly rare sweet-spot. The size of a planet plays a role in its potential for water, and larger habitable planets allow for increased water coverage, while smaller planets would all look more like Tatooine with vast, dry deserts.
Checking the Data
However, while powerful computer simulations do utilize hard data to make their predictions, the results are far from guaranteed. Experts advise caution in taking these findings at face value. In a conversation with Gizmodo, astrophysicist Sean Raymond says that Simpson’s paper puzzles him. He goes on to explain that predicting how much water might be on a planet is impossible since we can’t account for how much water is delivered to a given planet. “In the ‘classical model’ of terrestrial planet formation, water delivery to Earth is very [random] so it’s reasonable to imagine alternate Earths with over ten times more water,” he says. “However, in our newer models much less water is delivered but the delivery is more reliable.”
Even so, Simpson has stated that his theory will soon be testable. Advanced technology like the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope will allow us to see deeper into space with greater clarity. The tool could also be used to garner more exact measurements of water on exoplanets.
The presence of water on other planets is an important jumping off point for scientists but by no means does it guarantee the presence of extraterrestrial life. Further study will help us to narrow down potential places to look.