--- title: "Twitter May Be in Deep Trouble Over That Blue Check Stunt" description: "Legal experts say that Elon Musk's most recent Twitter verification fiasco might get the platform into new trouble with the FTC." date: "2023-04-28" modified: "2023-04-28" authors: - name: "Maggie Harrison Dupré" job_title: "Senior Staff Writer" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/mharrison" url: "https://futurism.com/twitter-deep-trouble-blue-check" categories: - "Future Society" tags: - "elon musk" - "ftc" - "social media" - "twitter" --- # Twitter May Be in Deep Trouble Over That Blue Check Stunt ![Legal experts say that Elon Musk's most recent Twitter verification fiasco might get the platform into new trouble with the FTC.]() *NEW YORK, NEW YORK - OCTOBER 31: Elon Musk attends Heidi Klum's 2022 Hallowe'en Party at Sake No Hana at Moxy LES on October 31, 2022 in New York City. (Photo by Taylor Hill/Getty Images) \Image: Getty Images/Taylor Hill\* Turns out that Twitter CEO Elon Musk's blue check rollback might be more than just messy. According to some legal experts, it might actually end up getting the billionaire into regulatory trouble with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). To recap: late last week, Mr. Tweet [finally rolled back]() the company's legacy [verification system](), supposedly leaving the platform's coveted blue verification checks to Twitter Blue subscribers. Some non-subscribing Twitter users, however — mostly celebrities like Stephen King and Lebron James, in addition to some other popular accounts — were [shocked to discover]() when they logged on that their blue check was somehow still there, even though they weren't coughing up $8 a month to keep it. Musk later admitted to paying for those checks himself, explaining them away as gifts. But as John Davisson, the senior counsel and director of litigation at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, [told *Quartz*](), there's a chance that Musk's "gifting" can be counted as deceptive marketing — a big no-no in the eyes of the federal law and, of course, the regulating body that is the FTC. "Star power is a valuable marketing tool, and Twitter clearly knows that — how else to explain the decision to restore blue checkmarks only to the most popular accounts?" Davisson explained to *Quartz* in an email. "But if a celebrity hasn’t actually subscribed to Twitter Blue, it's \[a\] materially misleading statement to claim they have." Davisson's comment does make a lot of sense. After all, over on Instagram and TikTok, celebrities and influencers are legally obligated to disclose if and when a company is paying them for promotions (hence the hashtag-ad of it all.) Twitter, another social media platform, should surely operate the same way. Of course, it's a bit of a different situation, considering that said influencers — some of whom, in a very gross turn, [were *dead* celebrities]() — were influencing without their knowledge or consent, but the logic that Twitter would be in the wrong for lack of disclosure on its part still holds. To make the odds even worse for Twitter, the company, as Quartz notes, has run into trouble with the FTC before. Upon his purchase of the platform, Musk inherited two (2) FTC consent decrees. And as we all know, three strikes generally means you're out. "If Twitter has a third order \[from the FTC\], it's going to be a lot stricter than the first and second, and it could regulate this very thing they’re trying to make money off of—these blue checkmarks," one anonymous former FTC official told *Quartz*. "If Musk is named, it could really undermine the future success of Twitter, and it could interfere with Musk’s operation of his other companies." "I think the FTC is going to have a very strong desire," the former official continued, "to throw the book at Twitter." **READ MORE:** [*Elon Musk is courting fresh FTC scrutiny with his latest Twitter fiasco*]() \[*Quartz*\] **More on Elon's Twitter:** [*Twitter Apparently Ignored Its Chance to Stop a Kidnapping*]() ## Author At Futurism, I've reported extensively on the rise of AI as a cultural and business force shaping the media industry, and more broadly how those dynamics are changing how we all consume and share information and relate to one another. I'm also fascinated by public health policy and ethics, the role of emerging tech in politics and governance — and the powerful people and forces at those intersections — climate change, and the environment. My investigation on Sports Illustrated's use of AI-generated authors with fictional biographies won a 2024 Mirror Award for "Best Story on Media Coverage of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism and the Media" from Syracuse University's SI Newhouse School, I contributed to Niemen Lab's 2025 Predictions for Journalism series, and I've discussed my work for Futurism during appearances on NPR, CNN, the BBC, the CBC, and more. I grew up in rural Pennsylvania and attended the University of Massachusetts Amherst, where I played Division I field hockey for the Minutewomen as a midfielder. Since then, I've lived in New Orleans, Louisiana and Manhattan, New York. I spend my free time running, reading, perusing archival fashion, and searching for the world’s best negroni. I also have a debonair tuxedo cat, Westley, who's named after "The Princess Bride." ### Author social links [Bluesky]()