---
title: "Tesla Didn’t Want to Give Full Self-Driving Demo to DMV Authorities"
description: "The California DMV wanted a demo of Tesla's Full Self-Driving, but the automaker resisted letting some of the DMV's advisers attend."
date: "2022-11-06"
modified: "2022-11-06"
authors:
  - name: "Frank Landymore"
    job_title: "Contributing Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/flandymore"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/tesla-dmv-full-self-driving-demo"
categories:
  - "Advanced Transport"
  - "Self-Driving Vehicles"
  - "Tesla"
tags:
  - "autopilot"
  - "full self-driving"
  - "tesla"
  - "the digest"
---

# Tesla Didn’t Want to Give Full Self-Driving Demo to DMV Authorities

![The California DMV wanted a demo of Tesla's Full Self-Driving, but the automaker resisted letting some of the DMV's advisers attend.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/tesla-dmv-full-self-driving-demo.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Tesla\</em\>*

## Grudge Match

Tesla has come under a lot of scrutiny lately, including from its home state California DMV. In August, [the DMV filed a complaint](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/california-tesla-full-self-driving>) that accused the Elon Musk-led automaker of misleading customers by naming its advanced driver assistance systems "Full Self-Driving" (FSD) and "Autopilot" — names that heavily imply that they're fully autonomous, even though both require constant attention on the road.

So last week, the state's DMV investigators wanted to get a look at the FSD beta for themselves and held a demo at their Sacramento headquarters.

However, according to [emails obtained by *Bloomberg*](<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-11-01/tesla-gives-demo-to-california-dmv-probing-self-driving-claims?sref=YfHlo0rL>), Tesla initially didn't want to play ball. Why? Because the automaker harbored a grudge against several attending DMV advisers who had publicly been critical of Tesla in the past.

"I question whether it is appropriate to include your consultants that have made negative public statements about Tesla," wrote Jennifer Cohen, Tesla's California lead for policy and business development, to Miguel Acosta, the DMV's autonomous vehicle chief, in an email and quoted by *Bloomberg*. "We have yet to receive any assurance that their bias does not influence DMV's treatment of Tesla."

Acosta didn't seem to care — but was very cordial about it, of course.

"We appreciate Tesla's continued assistance in providing information regarding the latest releases and expansion of the Full Self-Driving Beta program and features," Acosta wrote. "Our consultants assist us with our ongoing examination of the technology available on California public roads."

## Petty Is As Petty Does

Per *Bloomberg's* reporting, one of the advisers Tesla had it out for was Bryant Walker Smith from Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and Society, who said that the state's autonomous vehicle testing should apply to Tesla's FSD. How controversial!

Another was Steven Shladover, a UC Berkeley transportation research engineer who [had written previously](<https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-05-26/dmv-tesla-year-long-slow-walk>) that Tesla's use of the term self-driving was "very damaging."

Making a big stink over guys whose jobs often require them to be critical of an industry they regulate? It's not a great look, especially given how mild their critiques were.

It's cagey behavior from the automaker, and it comes across as a little desperate.

After all, Tesla is under a lot of pressure. The feds are [knocking on its door](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/tesla-autopilot-crashes-recall>), too, after widening an investigation into crashes that involved FSD and Autopilot.

**More on Tesla:** *[Elon Musk Pulling Engineers From Tesla Autopilot to Work on Twitter](<https://futurism.com/elon-musk-engineers-tesla-autopilot-twitter>)*

## Author
At Futurism, my work has often centered on bringing a sense of clarity and insight to complex topics ranging from the regulation of emerging technologies to the esoteric ideologies of Silicon Valley executives, while striving not to lose the poetic sense of awe inspired by often-obscure fields like astrophysics and quantum computing. I broke the story of CNET using AI to produce articles that turned out to be riddled with factual errors and plagiarism — a dam-breaking inflection point, as I've reported, that's inspired copycats and endless discourse while beguiling stakeholders ranging from tech giants to purveyors of spam around the web. My work at Futurism has been cited by publications including CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, Vice, Gizmodo, Engadget, the Verge, and Vanity Fair. I grew up in locales ranging from India to China, and now live in the exotic suburbs of Virginia. In my free time, I'm an avid reader of weird sci-fi literature, an aficionado of East Asian cinema, and, regrettably, a relapsed gamer. Allegedly, I’m working on a debut novel, currently untitled.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/f-w-l.bsky.social>)