---
title: "Study Finds That Buttons in Cars Are Safer and Quicker to Use Than Touchscreens"
description: "It seems like automakers are all too quick to get rid of good ol’ fashioned buttons and switches these days, in favor of all-powerful, touchscreen infotainment systems. These touchscreens are giant too, and not always intuitive or easy to navigate. And apparently, using them is far less safe and easy than the old school alternative, […]"
date: "2022-08-17"
modified: "2022-08-17"
authors:
  - name: "Frank Landymore"
    job_title: "Contributing Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/flandymore"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-finds-that-buttons-in-cars-are-safer-and-quicker-to-use-than-touchscreens"
categories:
  - "Future Society"
tags:
  - "car safety"
  - "cars"
  - "the digest"
  - "touchscreen"
---

# Study Finds That Buttons in Cars Are Safer and Quicker to Use Than Touchscreens

![Cars in recent years have come equipped with larger, more feauture-packed touchscreen infotainment systems. But are they really better than simple buttons?](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/study-finds-that-buttons-in-cars-are-safer-and-quicker-to-use-than-touchscreens.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Yuriko Nakao/Getty Images\</em\>*

## Button Pusher

Many automakers are getting rid of good ol’ fashioned buttons and switches these days, in favor of touchscreen [infotainment systems](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/mercedes-benz-hyperscreen-touchscreen-display>).

Now, new evidence shows those touchscreens are far less safe and efficient than the old school alternative, according to the [findings of Swedish car magazine](<https://www.vibilagare.se/nyheter/physical-buttons-outperform-touchscreens-new-cars-test-finds#vote>) *Vi Bilägare.*

Over the summer, the magazine conducted tests across 12 models of cars — eleven modern, along with one 2005 Volvo with physical controls — and allowed test drivers to get to know the ins and outs of the vehicles. The tests themselves were simple: drivers were instructed to cruise down an empty airstrip at 68 miles per hour and were timed on the completion of four infotainment tasks, ranging from adjusting the AC to messing with the radio.

The Swedish magazine found that the 2005 Volvo far outperformed the modern, infotainment screen equipped cars, with a driver completing all four tasks in just ten seconds and 1,000 feet traveled.

Meanwhile, the best time in the modern cars was nearly 14 seconds. But even these speeds were relative outliers, because for the majority of infotainment equipped vehicles, it took well over 20 seconds and at least 2,000 feet.

## Screening Calls

It’s not the most rigorously empirical study and the sample size is small, but it is thought provoking in its implications.

There's no doubt that infotainment systems are powerful, coming equipped with everything from 360 degree cameras to advanced GPS navigation. But when the interfaces aren't efficient to use, and they control functions like windshield wipers or climate controls, it starts to get a little ridiculous.

Traditional buttons, knobs, and switches have a tactility that allow drivers to intuitively find and adjust them while keeping their eyes on the road. A slippery touchscreen does not. Analog controls are also permanently positioned, whereas a touchscreen may require additional navigation to reach a feature.

Has a push for elegant minimalism over simplicity, and a craze for smartphone-like tech, turned our cars into needlessly [distracting machines](<https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-seniors-autos/vehicle-infotainment-systems-dangerously-distracting-especially-for-seniors-idUSKCN1UK34F>)? Surely there’s a happy medium.

**More on cars:** [BMW Now Selling Drivers Access to Their Cars' Heating Systems for $18 Per Month](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/bmw-heating-microtransactions>)

## Author
At Futurism, my work has often centered on bringing a sense of clarity and insight to complex topics ranging from the regulation of emerging technologies to the esoteric ideologies of Silicon Valley executives, while striving not to lose the poetic sense of awe inspired by often-obscure fields like astrophysics and quantum computing. I broke the story of CNET using AI to produce articles that turned out to be riddled with factual errors and plagiarism — a dam-breaking inflection point, as I've reported, that's inspired copycats and endless discourse while beguiling stakeholders ranging from tech giants to purveyors of spam around the web. My work at Futurism has been cited by publications including CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, Vice, Gizmodo, Engadget, the Verge, and Vanity Fair. I grew up in locales ranging from India to China, and now live in the exotic suburbs of Virginia. In my free time, I'm an avid reader of weird sci-fi literature, an aficionado of East Asian cinema, and, regrettably, a relapsed gamer. Allegedly, I’m working on a debut novel, currently untitled.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/f-w-l.bsky.social>)