---
title: "Professor: Asimov’s Laws Are Outdated and It’s Time to Write More"
description: "AI legal expert Frank Pasquale says that Asimov's laws of robotics are outdated, and he has some ideas for new ones to supplement them."
date: "2020-11-20"
modified: "2020-11-20"
authors:
  - name: "Dan Robitzski"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/danrobitzski"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/professor-asimovs-laws-outdated-time-write-more"
categories:
  - "Robots and Machines"
tags:
  - "artificial intelligence"
  - "asimov's laws"
  - "robots"
  - "the digest"
---

# Professor: Asimov’s Laws Are Outdated and It’s Time to Write More

![AI legal expert Frank Pasquale says that Asimov's laws of robotics are outdated, and he has some ideas for new ones to supplement them.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/asimovs-laws-outdated-time-write-more.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Image via Pixabay/Victor Tangermann\</em\>*

## New Laws

The Three Laws of Robotics, penned by sci-fi author Isaac Asimov in 1942, have shaped attitudes toward real-world robots to a striking extent:

1. Robots must not harm humans.
2. Robots must obey humans.
3. Robots must protect themselves.

But nearly 80 years later, AI law expert and Brooklyn Law School professor Frank Pasquale argues in a [new book](<https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674975224>), we're due for some new ones.

Pasquale lays out four new laws of robotics, which [he told *OneZero*](<https://onezero.medium.com/its-time-to-add-4-new-laws-of-robotics-8791139cdb11>) are designed to account for the ways we actually interact with robots in the year 2020 — like workplace automation.

## AI Assistants

Pasquale explains that his four new laws are meant to protect humanity from robots and AI in more realistic ways than Asimov envisioned. Think less "I, Robot" and more how AI could [replace human workers](<https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence-experts-fear>) or pit humanity against itself. With new laws, he argues, AI can better serve humanity instead of being used for whatever it is that Silicon Valley engineers decide to do with it [behind closed doors](<https://futurism.com/google-dont-be-evil>).

His suggestions are as follows, as summarized by *OneZero*:

1. Digital technologies ought to "complement professionals, not replace them."
2. AI and robotic systems "should not counterfeit humanity."
3. AI should be prevented from intensifying "zero-sum arms races."
4. Robotic and AI systems need to be forced to "indicate the identity of their creators(s), controller(s), and owners(s)."

## Algorithmic Accountability

Notably, these laws are also directed at the people who develop or implement AI rather than robots themselves, since they're the ones who have the power to actually hire and fire human workers.

"I think the big dream of a lot of folks in AI is presumably just letting it take on the job of a doctor, nurse, journalist, teacher, and so on," Pasquale told *OneZero*. "And my idea is that’s really not the goal we should be going for, right?"

"For me, the proper role of a lot of these technology fields is to complement and support professionals, not replace them," he added.

**READ MORE:** [Asimov’s Three Laws Helped Shape A.I. and Robotics. We Need Four More.](<https://onezero.medium.com/its-time-to-add-4-new-laws-of-robotics-8791139cdb11>) \[*OneZero*\]

**More on AI:** *[Should Evil AI Research Be Published? Five Experts Weigh In.](<https://futurism.com/should-evil-ai-research-be-published-five-experts-weigh-in>)*

## Author
Dan Robitzki is a senior reporter for Futurism, where he likes to cover AI, tech ethics, and medicine. He spends his extra time fencing and streaming games from Los Angeles, California.

### Author social links  
[Twitter](<https://x.com/danrobitzski>)