---
title: "Paul McCartney Reverses Opinion on AI After Using It to Produce New “Beatles” Song, Now Alarmed It Will “Wipe Out” the Music Industry"
description: "Despite using artificial intelligence tools to help resuscitate old John Lennon vocals, Paul McCartney is now against some AI uses."
date: "2024-12-14"
modified: "2024-12-14"
authors:
  - name: "Noor Al-Sibai"
    job_title: "Senior Staff Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/nooralsibai"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/paul-mccartney-ai-training-data"
categories:
  - "Artificial Intelligence"
tags:
  - "ai music"
  - "musicians"
  - "the beatles"
  - "the digest"
---

# Paul McCartney Reverses Opinion on AI After Using It to Produce New “Beatles” Song, Now Alarmed It Will “Wipe Out” the Music Industry

![Despite using artificial intelligence tools to help resuscitate old John Lennon vocals, Paul McCartney is now against some AI uses.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/paul-mccartney-ai-training-data.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Dimitrios Kambouris / Getty for The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame / Futurism\</em\>*

## White Knight

Despite previously [using artificial intelligence](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/paul-mccartney-ai-create-last-beatles-record>) tools to help resuscitate old John Lennon vocals, fellow Beatle Paul McCartney is now singing a different tune about the tech.

As [*the Guardian* reports](<https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/10/paul-mccartney-ai-warning-uk-debates-copyright-laws>), the beknighted Beatle has issued a statement ahead of the UK parliament's debate over [amending its data bill](<https://ppa.co.uk/lords-propose-amendments-to-data-bill-to-tackle-copyright-and-ai>) to allow artists to exclude their work from AI training data. In it, McCartney warned that AI may take over the industry if nobody takes a stand.

"We\[’ve\] got to be careful about it," the Beatle said, "because it could just take over and we don’t want that to happen, particularly for the young composers and writers \[for\] who, it may be the only way they\[’re\] gonna make a career."

"If AI wipes that out," he continued, "that would be a very sad thing indeed."

## Then and Now

McCartney's new position on AI comes just over a month after the Grammy Awards announced that the final Beatles song, "[Now and Then](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/beatles-final-song-ai>)," had been [nominated for two awards](<https://www.grammy.com/awards/67th-annual-grammy-awards-2024>) — making it the [first AI-assisted track](<https://www.billboard.com/pro/the-beatles-now-and-then-first-ai-assisted-song-grammy-nomination-history/>) ever to get the nod from the Recording Academy.

Though the track was made using AI, it wasn't the generative type that's been getting immense buzz lately. Around the time the song was released, [McCartney revealed](<https://www.theguardian.com/music/2023/jun/23/paul-mccartney-says-theres-nothing-artificial-in-new-beatles-song-made-using-ai>) that engineers had used AI tech known as "stem separation" to lift the assassinated Beatle's vocals from an old demo.

"There it was, John’s voice, crystal clear," the Wings singer said in a [press release](<https://www.abbeyroad.com/news/the-beatles-announce-last-ever-song-now-and-then-along-with-red-and-blue-album-reissues-3375>) about the song and titular album last year. "It’s quite emotional. And we all play on it, it’s a genuine Beatles recording."

Former Beatles drummer Ringo Starr added in that statement that the AI tech that helped bring Lennon's vocals back to life was "far out."

"It was the closest we’ll ever come to having him back in the room," Starr expounded, "so it was very emotional for all of us."

Be that as it may, both McCartney and Starr's names are absent from a [popular petition](<https://www.aitrainingstatement.org/>) against the unauthorized use of artists' work by AI companies. Most recently, "Running Up That Hill" songstress [Kate Bush](<https://www.nme.com/news/music/kate-bush-joins-campaign-against-ai-being-used-without-artists-permission-3821597>) became one of the more than 36,000 [signatories](<https://www.aitrainingstatement.org/signatories>) to join the anti-AI campaign, which also features well-heeled endorsers across industries including Julianne Moore, Stephen Fry, and The Cure's Robert Smith.

It's not quite "AI for me but not for thee," but the remaining Beatles' absence from the petition feels noteworthy as their home country prepares to debate whether to sign AI restrictions into law.

**More on AI and musicians:** [*The AI That De-Ages Eminem Into Slim Shady Is Astonishingly Bad*](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/ai-de-aged-eminem-slim-shady>)

## Author
At Futurism, I've often been drawn to unpacking the narratives that underlie technological, scientific and medical progress, with a special interest in areas of conflict and ambiguity that end up setting agendas and steering the fates of both elites and the hoi polloi. I'm a committed generalist, but I often find myself returning to work involving NASA and the private space sector, the effects of AI on media and society, and the mechanics of the pharmaceutical industry, with a specific focus on the spread of GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy. Prior to Futurism, I worked for publications ranging from Media Matters and Truthdig to Raw Story and Bustle. I'm also the author of "Myspace Scene Queens," a 2024 title in Instar Books' acclaimed "Remember the Internet" series. My work at Futurism has been cited by outlets including the New Yorker, Slate, Nieman Lab, the Verge, the MIT Technology Review, the Sunday Times, and the Daily Beast. I grew up in North Carolina, attended the University of North Carolina at Asheville, and now live in Brooklyn, New York. In my free time, I'm an avid reader and music fan; you can probably find me at a local poetry reading, concert, underground rave, or DJ set. I'm the proud parent of an ineffable orange cat named Mee-Mow.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/noorfromfuturism.bsky.social>)