--- title: "Google Paid $2.7 Billion to Get a Single AI Researcher Back" description: "Google spent $2.7 billion to rehire AI expert Noam Shazeer, as part of a software licensing deal with his AI startup Character." date: "2024-09-28" modified: "2024-09-28" authors: - name: "Victor Tangermann" job_title: "Senior Editor" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor" url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/google-paid-billion-single-ai-researcher-back" categories: - "Artificial Intelligence" - "Google" tags: - "generative ai" - "Google" - "the digest" --- # Google Paid $2.7 Billion to Get a Single AI Researcher Back ![Google spent $2.7 billion to rehire AI expert Noam Shazeer, as part of a software licensing deal with his AI startup Character.]() *\Image: Winni Wintermeyer for The Washington Post via Getty Images/Futurism\* ## Talented Mr. Shazeer Google reportedly spent $2.7 billion to rehire AI expert Noam Shazeer — an astonishing amount of money for what boils down to the expertise of a single computer scientist. Shazeer [left Google]() in 2021 after 21 years at the company to start his own startup called Character.AI, which allows users to interact with chatbots that roleplay as imaginary characters or well-known figures. The official reason Google gave billions of dollars to the startup was to license its tech. But as the [*Wall Street Journal* reports](), "Shazeer's return is widely viewed as the primary reason" as to why the tech giant cut the check. The deal highlights just how much money tech companies are spending to get a potential edge in the AI arms race. In parallel, Silicon Valley investors [have grown very concerned]() as of late that companies like Google or Microsoft are throwing away countless billions of dollars with no return in sight, inflating a [massive bubble that is set to burst](). Look no further than a company spending nearly three billion on getting a single engineer to come back. "Noam is clearly a great person in that space," Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory director Christopher Manning told the *WSJ*. But is he "20 times as good as other people?" ## Window Shopping While Shazeer wasn't the sole or direct recipient of Google's $2.7 billion, he raked in hundreds of millions of dollars from his stake in the startup as part of the deal, sources told the *WSJ*. That's still a massive paycheck, especially considering Shazeer didn't sell his company. Shazeer was a foundational part of Google's early efforts to develop AI. A [2017 paper]() he coauthored is largely seen as the early dawn of the large language models as we know them today. And he isn't shy about his contributions. On [his LinkedIn](), he claims that "I have invented much of the current revolution in large language models." The computer scientist left Google after the company refused to release a chatbot dubbed Meena to the public in 2021, citing safety concerns, per the *WSJ*. Ironically, OpenAI released ChatGPT one year later, highlighting a massive wasted opportunity for Google. In August, news emerged that Shazeer would return to Google as part of Google's parent company Alphabet's deal with Character.AI. Several other similar deals show that tech giants like Microsoft and Amazon are racing to secure AI researchers like Shazeer. In June, for instance, Amazon [hired top executives]() from an AI startup called Adept through a technology licensing deal. As companies continue to pour billions into the [environmentally damaging]() and [still largely unproven]() tech, though, investors are starting to ask some tough questions. Should they really be paying several billion dollars to get the expertise of a single hire — or is it a colossal waste of money that won't ever see a return? All we can do is watch the situation play out. **More on Google:** *[AI Datacenters More Than 600 Percent Worse for Environment Than Tech Companies Claimed]()* ## Author I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()