---
title: "Forcing Workers Back to the Office Might Not Have Been a Good Idea After All"
description: "A new survey shows that the vast majority of senior executives say would've approached their return-to-work push \"differently.\""
date: "2023-08-19"
modified: "2023-08-19"
authors:
  - name: "Frank Landymore"
    job_title: "Contributing Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/flandymore"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/forcing-workers-office-mistake"
categories:
  - "Future Society"
tags:
  - "remote work"
  - "the digest"
  - "work from home"
---

# Forcing Workers Back to the Office Might Not Have Been a Good Idea After All

![A new survey shows that the vast majority of senior executives say would've approached their return-to-work push "differently."](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/forcing-workers-office-mistake.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Chuck Savage via Getty Images\</em\>*

## Show Me the Data!

In a rare moment of clarity — or even, dare we say, self reflection? — a whole bunch of executives have admitted that they may have been wrong about the whole return-to-office push made after the COVID-19 pandemic. Well, sort of.

In a [Hanover Research and Envoy survey](<https://envoy.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Workplace_Data_Report_Final-Document-Envoy-230808-1.pdf>) of over 1,100 senior executives and workplace managers in the United States, a whopping 80 percent answered that they would've "approached their company's return-to-office strategy differently" if they had the right "workplace data" at the time.

"Differently" could mean a lot of things, but it's not *quite* an admission of wrongdoing. The report, and by extension the execs, seem more annoyed by the lack of solid data on hybrid workplaces than they are concerned about employee satisfaction or the backlash they incurred.

Without that precious data, 23 percent of managers say they rely on their gut instinct instead. This is bad practice, says the joint report, because for hybrid workplaces, the mix of employees coming and going at different times a week makes it "impossible" for a manager to know how many employees are on site on a given day. The report follows this grave conclusion with a plug for its own AI-driven data service. Staying classy, as always.

## Tech Tyrants

Of course, instead of just bemoaning their unsatiated data fetishes and where it's led them, the execs could've just listened to their workers, many of whom were vocal about concerns over being forced to attend in person despite health, safety, and convenience issues. After all, many of these pushes were being made while the pandemic was still in full swing.

The tech industry, despite being uniquely well suited for remote work, has been notoriously bad about this.

Case in point: last April, a group of high-ranking [employees at Apple declared their resignation](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/apple-workers-quit-dont-return-office-pandemic>) after Apple refused to budge on its stringent policy requiring all employees work in person at least three times a week, a policy it had [first attempted in the summer previous](<https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/4/22491629/apple-employees-push-back-return-office-internal-letter-tim-cook>), not long before COVID would peak later that winter.

Tesla is another notable culprit, whose CEO Elon Musk harbors a well documented [vendetta against remote workers](<https://futurism.com/former-tesla-manager-elon-musk-email>). Ironically, and perhaps proving workers' points that a sweeping return-to-office policy would be both impractical and inconsiderate, Tesla's workplaces reportedly [didn't even have enough desks, chairs, or parking spaces](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/tesla-workers-office-desks>) for returning employees.

Most recently, [Google has considered cracking down on remote work](<https://www.wsj.com/articles/google-gets-stricter-about-employees-time-in-office-9a20f2e>) even more than it has already. Whereas it has required three days in-person for the past year, it is now eyeing a full five day requirement, barring exceptional cases.

**More on:** *[CEO of OpenAI Trashes Remote Work As a Failed "Experiment"](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/openai-ceo-remote-work>)*

## Author
At Futurism, my work has often centered on bringing a sense of clarity and insight to complex topics ranging from the regulation of emerging technologies to the esoteric ideologies of Silicon Valley executives, while striving not to lose the poetic sense of awe inspired by often-obscure fields like astrophysics and quantum computing. I broke the story of CNET using AI to produce articles that turned out to be riddled with factual errors and plagiarism — a dam-breaking inflection point, as I've reported, that's inspired copycats and endless discourse while beguiling stakeholders ranging from tech giants to purveyors of spam around the web. My work at Futurism has been cited by publications including CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, Vice, Gizmodo, Engadget, the Verge, and Vanity Fair. I grew up in locales ranging from India to China, and now live in the exotic suburbs of Virginia. In my free time, I'm an avid reader of weird sci-fi literature, an aficionado of East Asian cinema, and, regrettably, a relapsed gamer. Allegedly, I’m working on a debut novel, currently untitled.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/f-w-l.bsky.social>)