---
title: "Leaked Executive Order Would Let US Gov Control Social Media"
description: "A leaked executive order draft would put Facebook and Twitter social media content moderation under the purview of the FCC to stamp out perceived bias."
date: "2019-08-12"
modified: "2019-08-12"
authors:
  - name: "Dan Robitzski"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/danrobitzski"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/executive-order-us-control-social-media"
categories:
  - "Future Society"
tags:
  - "communications"
  - "moderation"
  - "social media"
  - "the digest"
---

# Leaked Executive Order Would Let US Gov Control Social Media

![A leaked executive order draft would put Facebook and Twitter social media content moderation under the purview of the FCC to stamp out perceived bias.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/executive-order-us-control-social-media.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: FCC/Victor Tangermann\</em\>*

## Cracking Down

Trump wants to do something most Twitter users could only dream about: enlisting the federal government to make sure his posts get more engagement.

A leaked draft of an executive order [reviewed by *CNN Business*](<https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/09/tech/white-house-social-media-executive-order-fcc-ftc/>) would give the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) broader power to regulate how social media sites like Facebook and Twitter moderate and curate content on their platforms. While many have called for [increased regulation](<https://futurism.com/zuckerberg-gdpr-cambridge-analytica>) of social media companies, this executive order seems to be at least partially motivated by the perceived anti-conservative bias on social media — that Trump insists exists [despite a lack of evidence](<https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/08/06/trump-accuses-google-anti-conservative-bias-without-providing-evidence/>).

## Section 230

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act [protects companies](<https://gizmodo.com/section-230-is-the-foundation-of-the-internet-so-why-d-1833590565>) from legal responsibility for content posted on their platforms, [like hate speech](<https://futurism.com/should-twitters-ban-hateful-content-apply-president-trump>), violence, and graphic images. That's why social media companies are generally [allowed to moderate themselves](<https://futurism.com/facebook-moderation-facility-dying>) as long as they're operating in "good faith."

But the new executive order would put all of that content moderation under the FCC's purview, *CNN* reports. The government agency would be able to take away a company's legal immunity if it removes or hides content without notifying the poster. The FCC can also strip the "good faith" immunity if it decides a company is acting unfairly or deceptively when hiding or removing content.

In concept, increased scrutiny over platforms that have been used to [radicalize shooters](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/trump-social-media-mass-shooters>), [enable genocide](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/myanmar-military-facebook-genocide>), and [spread misinformation](<https://futurism.com/eu-facebook-google-twitter-fake-news>) sounds like a good idea. But tech experts told *CNN* that this executive order will likely only complicate the process or backfire.

**READ MORE:** [White House proposal would have FCC and FTC police alleged social media censorship](<https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/09/tech/white-house-social-media-executive-order-fcc-ftc/>) \[*CNN Business*\]

**More on tech regulation:** *[Should Twitter’s Ban on Hateful Content Apply to President Trump?](<https://futurism.com/should-twitters-ban-hateful-content-apply-president-trump>)*

## Author
Dan Robitzki is a senior reporter for Futurism, where he likes to cover AI, tech ethics, and medicine. He spends his extra time fencing and streaming games from Los Angeles, California.

### Author social links  
[Twitter](<https://x.com/danrobitzski>)