---
title: "CEOs Suddenly Fear AI Will Take Their Jobs Too"
description: "A new report from AND Digital reveals that nearly half of the surveyed CEOs believe that AI could replace their jobs."
date: "2024-04-17"
modified: "2024-04-17"
authors:
  - name: "Frank Landymore"
    job_title: "Contributing Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/flandymore"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/ceos-fear-ai-jobs"
categories:
  - "Artificial Intelligence"
tags:
  - "chatgpt"
  - "generative ai"
  - "the digest"
---

# CEOs Suddenly Fear AI Will Take Their Jobs Too

![A new report from AND Digital reveals that nearly half of the surveyed CEOs believe that AI could replace their jobs.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ceos-fear-ai-jobs.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Getty / Futurism\</em\>*

## Business Blowback

As many CEOs gloat over the idea of [replacing their human workers with AI](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/ceos-layoffs-ai-2024-davos>), some of them are now starting to fear that they, too, may be on the chopping block.

Per a [new report](<https://www.and.digital/and-accelerate-whitepaper>) from the IT consulting firm AND Digital which surveyed hundreds of business leaders in the US, the UK, and the Netherlands, 43 percent of respondents said they believed AI could take their job as CEO.

Denizens of the C-suite aren't making a strong case for keeping their positions, either. Embarrassingly, nearly that exact same proportion — 45 percent — admitted to secretly making major business decisions "based on data and information obtained using ChatGPT." Strong evidence, perhaps, that maybe [replacing CEOs with AI](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/replacing-ceos-with-ai-makes-sense>) isn't such a bad idea after all.

## Preparing for the Inevitable

Rest assured, many of them claim that they aren't just looking to cover their own butts. According to the report, 68 percent of the CEOs said that ethical considerations over AI adoption in the workplace is a top priority issue — though those "considerations" could mean anything.

In fact, the chief execs have considerable anxiety about how workers will handle AI adoption, with 44 percent believing that their employees aren't prepared to use the technology.

Addressing those concerns, about 76 percent said that they're training their staff to be more digitally literate.

Other bosses responded differently. Preferring a more conservative approach, about 34 percent said that they've outright banned generative AI tools like ChatGPT from the workplace — though you have to wonder if some of them are among the 45 percent who admitted to making business decisions with the tech.

## Blame Game

However they decide to prepare for AI's adoption among employees, the bosses may have good reason to worry.

Last year, many large companies, [especially banks](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/jp-morgan-bans-chatgpt>), [started banning AI chatbots](<https://www.semafor.com/article/05/19/2023/chatgpt-companies-banning-workers>) amid reports that employees were [accidentally leaking information](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/amazon-begs-employees-chatgpt>) by talking with them. Beyond that, AI tools don't give reliable answers, so they're not something you'd want employees relying on.

Still, it's an ironic and blatantly hypocritical stance for CEOs to be taking at this point — especially since nearly half of them admitted to using ChatGPT to do their jobs.

If anything, we should be more worried about what *they* do with the technology rather than their employees. By and large, it will be CEOs deciding on how AI will fit into the workplace, not your average Joe.

**More on AI:** *[Mistral CEO Says AI Companies Are Trying to Build God](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/mistral-ceo-agi-god>)*

## Author
At Futurism, my work has often centered on bringing a sense of clarity and insight to complex topics ranging from the regulation of emerging technologies to the esoteric ideologies of Silicon Valley executives, while striving not to lose the poetic sense of awe inspired by often-obscure fields like astrophysics and quantum computing. I broke the story of CNET using AI to produce articles that turned out to be riddled with factual errors and plagiarism — a dam-breaking inflection point, as I've reported, that's inspired copycats and endless discourse while beguiling stakeholders ranging from tech giants to purveyors of spam around the web. My work at Futurism has been cited by publications including CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, Vice, Gizmodo, Engadget, the Verge, and Vanity Fair. I grew up in locales ranging from India to China, and now live in the exotic suburbs of Virginia. In my free time, I'm an avid reader of weird sci-fi literature, an aficionado of East Asian cinema, and, regrettably, a relapsed gamer. Allegedly, I’m working on a debut novel, currently untitled.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/f-w-l.bsky.social>)