---
title: "Dozens of Organizations Push Back Against Bill That Would Ban All AI Regulation"
description: "Over 100 organizations have signed a letter pushing back against a sweeping bill that would ban all AI regulation for the next ten years."
date: "2025-05-22"
modified: "2025-05-22"
authors:
  - name: "Maggie Harrison Dupré"
    job_title: "Senior Staff Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/mharrison"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/bill-ban-ai-regulation"
categories:
  - "Artificial Intelligence"
tags:
  - "ai"
  - "ai regulation"
  - "ai safety"
  - "the digest"
---

# Dozens of Organizations Push Back Against Bill That Would Ban All AI Regulation

![Over 100 organizations have signed a letter pushing back against a sweeping bill that would ban all AI regulation for the next ten years.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/bill-ban-ai-regulation.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Getty / Futurism\</em\>*

## No Rules, No Exceptions

The latest version of the Republicans' Budget Reconciliation Bill — the "one big, beautiful bill," as President Trump has called it — includes a clause that would [ban all AI regulation](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/new-law-ban-ai-regulation>) in the US at the state level for a full decade. Over 100 organizations, [*CNN* reports](<https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/19/tech/house-spending-bill-ai-provision-organizations-raise-alarm>), are calling for lawmakers not to pass it.

According to *CNN*, 141 policy groups, academic institutions, unions, and other organizations have [signed a letter](<https://demandprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/FINAL-Letter-Opposing-AI-State-Preemption-Google-Docs.pdf>) demanding that legislators in Washington walk back the sweeping deregulatory provision, urging that the bill would allow AI companies to run wild without safeguards or accountability — regardless of any negative impact their technology might have on American citizens.

The letter warns that under the proposal, Americans would have no way to institute regulatory safeguards around and against AI systems as they "increasingly shape critical aspects of Americans' lives," including in areas like "hiring, housing, healthcare, policing, and financial services."

There aren't any exceptions outlined in the bill, which declares instead that "no State or political subdivision thereof may enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems during the ten year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act," as[ *404* Media was first to flag](<https://www.404media.co/republicans-try-to-cram-ban-on-ai-regulation-into-budget-reconciliation-bill/>) last week.

"The AI preemption provision is a dangerous giveaway to Big Tech CEOs who have bet everything on a society where unfinished, unaccountable AI is prematurely forced into every aspect of our lives," Emily Peterson-Cassin of the nonprofit Demand Progress, whose organization wrote the letter, told *CNN.*

## Forseeable Harm

In the letter, the groups emphasize that such a drastic moratorium on regulatory action would mean that even in cases where a company "deliberately designs an algorithm that causes foreseeable harm — regardless of how intentional or egregious the misconduct or how devastating the consequences — the company making that bad tech would be unaccountable to lawmakers and the public."

Transformational new technologies can be riddled with unknown, chaotic, and sometimes quite destructive outcomes. And as the writers of the letter note, regulation can serve to fuel innovation, and not stifle it by way of a thousand [Silicon Valley lobbying-dollar-funded cuts](<https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/10/14/silicon-valley-the-new-lobbying-monster>).

"Protecting people from being harmed by new technologies," reads the letter, "including by holding companies accountable when they cause harm, ultimately spurs innovation and adoption of new technologies."

"We will only reap the benefits of AI," it continues, "if people have a reason to trust it."

**More on the bill:** [*New Law Would Ban All AI Regulation for a Decade*](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/new-law-ban-ai-regulation>)

## Author
At Futurism, I've reported extensively on the rise of AI as a cultural and business force shaping the media industry, and more broadly how those dynamics are changing how we all consume and share information and relate to one another. I'm also fascinated by public health policy and ethics, the role of emerging tech in politics and governance — and the powerful people and forces at those intersections — climate change, and the environment. My investigation on Sports Illustrated's use of AI-generated authors with fictional biographies won a 2024 Mirror Award for "Best Story on Media Coverage of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism and the Media" from Syracuse University's SI Newhouse School, I contributed to Niemen Lab's 2025 Predictions for Journalism series, and I've discussed my work for Futurism during appearances on NPR, CNN, the BBC, the CBC, and more. I grew up in rural Pennsylvania and attended the University of Massachusetts Amherst, where I played Division I field hockey for the Minutewomen as a midfielder. Since then, I've lived in New Orleans, Louisiana and Manhattan, New York. I spend my free time running, reading, perusing archival fashion, and searching for the world’s best negroni. I also have a debonair tuxedo cat, Westley, who's named after "The Princess Bride."

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/mharrisondupre.bsky.social>)