---
title: "A Third of Researchers Think that AI Could Cause a Nuclear-Level Catastrophe"
description: "According to a survey conducted by Stanford University, 36 percent of AI researchers believe that AI could cause \"nuclear-level catastrophe.\" Great."
date: "2023-04-13"
modified: "2023-04-13"
authors:
  - name: "Maggie Harrison Dupré"
    job_title: "Senior Staff Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/mharrison"
url: "https://futurism.com/the-byte/ai-nuclear-level-catastrophe"
categories:
  - "Artificial Intelligence"
tags:
  - "ai"
  - "autonomous ai"
  - "natural language processing"
  - "the digest"
---

# A Third of Researchers Think that AI Could Cause a Nuclear-Level Catastrophe

![According to a survey conducted by Stanford University, 36 percent of AI researchers believe that AI could cause "nuclear-level catastrophe." Great.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ai-nuclear-level-catastrophe.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Getty Images\</em\>*

## Nuke-Level

According to a [survey](<https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/>) conducted by Stanford University's Institute for Human-Centered AI, 36 percent of researchers believe that AI could cause a "nuclear-level catastrophe." Great.

The survey was conducted as part of the institute's [annual AI index report](<https://aiindex.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/HAI_AI-Index-Report_2023.pdf>), which is essentially the industry's state of the union.

While the report does have some high notes — the document notes that "policymaker interest in AI is on the rise," with the tech pushing scientific discovery forward — that 36 percent figure is a difficult number to ignore.

## More Ways Than One

If it makes anyone feel better, a user recently did try to get an autonomous AI system dubbed ChaosGPT to "destroy humanity," but it [didn't get very far at all](<https://futurism.com/ai-destroy-humanity-tried-its-best>).

That 36 percent figure does come with an important caveat. It only refers to AI decision-making — as in, an AI making a choice on its own that ultimately causes a catastrophe — and not *human misuse* of AI, a growing threat that the report addressed separately later on.

"According to the AIAAIC database... the number of AI incidents and controversies has increased 26 times since 2012," reads the report. "Some notable incidents in 2022 included a deepfake video of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy surrendering and US prisons using call-monitoring technology on their inmates."

"This growth is evidence, of both greater use of AI technologies and awareness of misuse possibilities," the researchers wrote.

In other words: there are other ways that AI can and is causing harm, if not by its proverbial own hand.

Despite these concerns, only 41 percent of natural language processing (NLP) researchers thought that AI should be regulated, according to the report.

## Buckle Up

The survey serves as a fascinating glimpse into the collective mind of the AI industry, which overall seems to have some ambivalence about the tech's future. Only 57 percent of researchers, for example, think that "recent research progress" is paving the way for artificial general intelligence.

Those polled did have one notable point of agreement: 73 percent of researchers "feel that AI could soon lead to revolutionary societal change."

So, whether we're on the way to a nuclear-level catastrophe, or something entirely different, you might want to buckle up.

**READ MORE:** [*Measuring trends in Artificial Intelligence*](<https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/>) \[*Stanford University*\]

**More on AI:** [*Grifters Using ChatGPT to Work Multiple Full-time Jobs at Once*](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/grifters-chatgpt-work-multiple-full-time-jobs-at-once>)

## Author
At Futurism, I've reported extensively on the rise of AI as a cultural and business force shaping the media industry, and more broadly how those dynamics are changing how we all consume and share information and relate to one another. I'm also fascinated by public health policy and ethics, the role of emerging tech in politics and governance — and the powerful people and forces at those intersections — climate change, and the environment. My investigation on Sports Illustrated's use of AI-generated authors with fictional biographies won a 2024 Mirror Award for "Best Story on Media Coverage of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism and the Media" from Syracuse University's SI Newhouse School, I contributed to Niemen Lab's 2025 Predictions for Journalism series, and I've discussed my work for Futurism during appearances on NPR, CNN, the BBC, the CBC, and more. I grew up in rural Pennsylvania and attended the University of Massachusetts Amherst, where I played Division I field hockey for the Minutewomen as a midfielder. Since then, I've lived in New Orleans, Louisiana and Manhattan, New York. I spend my free time running, reading, perusing archival fashion, and searching for the world’s best negroni. I also have a debonair tuxedo cat, Westley, who's named after "The Princess Bride."

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/mharrisondupre.bsky.social>)