---
title: "Trump Desperately Pumps Money Into Dying Coal Industry"
description: "Trump announced he would pump $700 million into the coal industry, which has been on the decline for decades."
date: "2026-06-06"
modified: "2026-06-06"
authors:
  - name: "Frank Landymore"
    job_title: "Contributing Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/flandymore"
url: "https://futurism.com/science-energy/trump-pumps-money-dying-coal"
categories:
  - "Energy"
  - "Environment"
  - "Science & Energy"
---

# Trump Desperately Pumps Money Into Dying Coal Industry

![An illustration featuring a photograph of President Donald Trump in front of several smoke stacks polluting the air, treated in the style of an oil painting.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/trump-pumps-money-dying-coal.jpg>)
*Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Roberto Schmidt / Getty Images; Shutterstock*

The coal industry has been in decline for decades. But tell that to president Trump, who's firmly convinced he'd rather save coal from dying than the Earth's climate.

Extolling the power of "clean, beautiful coal," Trump [announced Thursday](<https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/climate/trump-coal-plants-funding.html>) that the federal government will heap $700 million towards supporting the coal industry, which will go to existing coal-burning plants as well as fund the construction of two new ones.

"We're into energy that really works," Trump said during a briefing at the Oval Office, calling his plan a "historic action to bring down the price of energy."

Pound for pound, coal is the most carbon-emitting fuel and is [the largest source of global CO2 emissions](<https://www.iea.org/fuels-and-technologies/coal/>), releasing loads of other toxic pollutants. For decades, many countries, including the US, have been phasing out coal power, with it [accounting for just ten percent](<https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=65445>) of domestic energy production.

But the rapid rise of the AI industry has seen a surge in demand for more power, and coal plants once on the verge of being sunsetted are increasingly [being brought back online](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/coal-plants-ai>) to meet those energy needs.

Trump is procuring the $700 million in funds by invoking the 1950 Defense Production Act, a Cold War-era law that gives the president emergency powers to control domestic industries in the name of national security. It's part of a playbook he's used in the past: in 2025, he [declared a national energy emergency](<https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2026/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-strengthens-united-states-national-defense-with-americas-beautiful-clean-coal-power-generation-fleet/>) in a similar bid to revitalize the coal industry.

In a grimly ironic twist, these funds are coming from money Congress originally set aside to reduce CO2 emissions from heavily polluting industries, [according to *The New York Times*](<https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/04/climate/trump-coal-plants-funding.html>).

$425 million of the funds will be used to upgrade 13 coal plants and keep them online past their expected shelf life. Additional funding will go towards the construction of two new plants in Alaska and West Virginia, which will be the first new coal plants built in the US since 2013.

The move was unsurprisingly blasted by environmental experts.

"Propping up coal billionaires with taxpayer money is one more way for the Trump administration to put polluters first and put the rest of us at risk," Kit Kennedy, managing director for power at the Natural Resources Defense Council, [told *The Associated Press*](<https://apnews.com/article/trump-coal-mining-power-plant-climate-electricity-0a7126d66de97b10f32eaa39b1af669f>).

On top of being critical of its environmental ramifications, the experts were skeptical that the coal industry could be restored to its former glory. Since 2010, 330 coal plants have been shut down and another 60 are slated to close by 2031, according to the environmental group the Sierra Club, per the *NYT*.

"There is no coal renaissance happening in the United States," Holly Bender, chief program officer at the Sierra Club, told the newspaper.

"Spending $700 million to bail out the coal industry is like throwing a lifeline to a ship that has already sunk,'' Lena Moffitt, executive director of Evergreen Action, another environmental group, told the *AP*.

Despite the moribund state of the industry, Trump is claiming his initiative will create 14,000 new jobs.

"Coal’s a great business," Trump said.

**More on the environment:** [*Trump Moves to Let Coal Companies Pollute Waterways With Their Toxic Slag*](<https://futurism.com/science-energy/coal-waste-trump>)

## Author
At Futurism, my work has often centered on bringing a sense of clarity and insight to complex topics ranging from the regulation of emerging technologies to the esoteric ideologies of Silicon Valley executives, while striving not to lose the poetic sense of awe inspired by often-obscure fields like astrophysics and quantum computing. I broke the story of CNET using AI to produce articles that turned out to be riddled with factual errors and plagiarism — a dam-breaking inflection point, as I've reported, that's inspired copycats and endless discourse while beguiling stakeholders ranging from tech giants to purveyors of spam around the web. My work at Futurism has been cited by publications including CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, Vice, Gizmodo, Engadget, the Verge, and Vanity Fair. I grew up in locales ranging from India to China, and now live in the exotic suburbs of Virginia. In my free time, I'm an avid reader of weird sci-fi literature, an aficionado of East Asian cinema, and, regrettably, a relapsed gamer. Allegedly, I’m working on a debut novel, currently untitled.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/f-w-l.bsky.social>)