---
title: "A Shocking Amount of US “Recycling” Goes Straight to the Landfill"
description: "According to a scathing new Greenpeace USA report, only five percent of plastic waste generated by US households — a shockingly low number."
date: "2022-10-24"
modified: "2022-10-24"
authors:
  - name: "Victor Tangermann"
    job_title: "Senior Editor"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor"
url: "https://futurism.com/plastic-recycling-landfill-greenpeace"
categories:
  - "Environment"
  - "Pollution"
  - "Science & Energy"
tags:
  - "plastic pollution"
  - "plastic waste"
  - "recycling"
---

# A Shocking Amount of US “Recycling” Goes Straight to the Landfill

![According to a scathing new Greenpeace USA report, only five percent of plastic waste generated by US households — a shockingly low number.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/plastic-recycling-landfill-greenpeace.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Getty Images/Futurism\</em\>*

According to a scathing [new Greenpeace USA report](<https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/GPUS_FinalReport_2022.pdf>), only five percent of plastic waste generated by US households actually gets recycled.

In other words, despite our best efforts, the vast majority of plastic waste ends up in the landfill. In large part, that's due to the fact that China stopped importing plastic waste back in 2018, causing a massive pile up in western countries.

Since then, though, the US has failed to get its act together. The average American generated just over 300 pounds of plastic per person in 2021, according to the report, which amounted to an astonishing 51 million tons of wrappers, bottles, bags and more in 2021 alone.

"After more than 30 years, it is time to accept that plastic recycling is a failed concept," the report reads, arguing that a circular plastic economy remains a "fiction."

Plastic waste remains difficult to collect, the report points out, and is often mixed, making it "functionally impossible to sort." The recycling process is also expensive and environmentally harmful in and of itself, while the resulting recycled plastic can still be contaminated by impurities.

New, non-recycled plastic also is being produced at rapidly rising rates, meaning that the situation is about to get a lot worse — not better.

Worst of all, much of this plastic can actually be recycled, such as PET and HDPE, often numbered as "1" and "2." About 20 and 10 percent of those are recycled, respectively.

Yet less than five percent of plastic numbered "3" through "7," which include things like coffee cups and plastic bags, were reprocessed, according to Greenpeace.

And there isn't much optimism in terms of turning things around any time soon.

"Industry groups and big corporations have been pushing for recycling as a solution," Greenpeace USA campaigner Lisa Ramsden [told *Agence France-Presse*](<https://phys.org/news/2022-10-plastic-recycling-myth-greenpeace.html>). "By doing that, they have shirked all responsibility" for making sure that recycling actually works.

Ramsden called out Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Unilever and Nestle in particular as some of the most egregious offenders.

To have a chance of making a change, Greenpeace is calling for the United Nations to push for a "refill and reuse" strategy, kind of "how the milkman used to be," Ramsden told *AFP*.

That's part of the UN's Global Plastics Treaty, which is set to legally bind its member countries to a trajectory to tackle the plastic pollution crisis by 2024.

"Instead of continuing to greenwash and mislead the American public," Ramsden added, "industry should support an ambitious Global Plastics Treaty that will finally end the age of plastic."

**READ MORE:** [Only 5% of plastic waste generated by US last year was recycled, report says](<https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/oct/23/us-plastic-waste-recycled-2021-greenpeace>) \[*The Guardian*\]

**More on plastic pollution:** *[Scientists Intrigued by Worms That Break Down Plastic Really Fast](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/scientists-worms-break-down-plastic>)*

## Author
I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/vtanger.bsky.social>)