---
title: "An NFT Painting Just Sold For $69 Million"
description: "A non fungible token by digital artist Mike Winkelmann, or \"Beeple,\" has sold for an astonishing $69 million at world-renowned auction house Christie's."
date: "2021-03-11"
modified: "2021-03-11"
authors:
  - name: "Victor Tangermann"
    job_title: "Senior Editor"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor"
url: "https://futurism.com/nft-painting-sold-69-million"
categories:
  - "Blockchain"
  - "Future Society"
  - "NFTs"
tags:
  - "art"
  - "blockchain"
  - "grimes"
---

# An NFT Painting Just Sold For $69 Million

![A non fungible token by digital artist Mike Winkelmann, or "Beeple," has sold for an astonishing $69 million at world-renowned auction house Christie's.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/nft-painting-sold-69-million.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Beeple\</em\>*

A work by digital artist Mike Winkelmann, better known as "Beeple," has sold for an [astonishing $69 million](<https://onlineonly.christies.com/s/beeple-first-5000-days/beeple-b-1981-1/112924>) at world-renowned auction house Christie's.

The work, titled "The First 5000 Days" was, according to Christie's, the "first purely digital work of art ever offered by a major auction house."

"The First 5000 Days" is a non-fungible token, or NFT for short. That means it's a unique, purely digital asset that is stored on a blockchain, the type of ledger that powers cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, using unique identification codes and metadata.

In other words, it's a truly one-of-a-kind digital representation of a digital asset — even if the work has been copied a million times online. It's an official claim to the ownership over the original of a given piece.

That makes it fundamentally different than a simple video or image file you could download from the internet. Since the NFT itself is unique, art collectors are hoping their NFT assets will be able to hold value. They also have hard-coded information embedded in them to always make sure the piece of art can be traced back to its rightful owner — a strong selling point in the theft-prone world of fine art.

The popularity of NFTs has skyrocketed in 2021, signaling that blockchain-based digital assets could become the ownership model of the future. Just this month, Canadian artist Grimes made [over $5.8 million](<https://www.businessinsider.com/grimes-nft-art-warnymph-sells-for-millions-20-minutes-2021-3>) in just 48 hours from selling her "WarNymph" digital collection in the form of NFTs. One [50 second file](<https://niftygateway.com/itemdetail/primary/0x948b3515d81034a3c16d5393c6c155946c93c103/1>) went for a cool $390,000.

The fact that an NFT has now sold for five figures at one of the biggest auction houses in the world only underlines that art collectors are taking the trend more seriously than ever before.

To many, particularly those who are directly profiting off of it, the trend marks a turning point, opening the floodgates for digital artists to imbue their work with monetary value and a way to legitimately sell their work online. In fact, up until October, Beeple never made more than $100 off of a single print, according to *The Verge*.

"I do view this as the next chapter of art history," Winkelmann said, according to *The Verge*. "Now there is a way to collect digital art."

Critics of the rise of NFTs, however, question the trend and see it as monetizing hype surrounding digital art.

It might also not be as secure as it is made out to be. In exactly the same way NFTs allow artists to sell unique pieces of art, digital works can be sold off as authentic even if they aren't.

Relying on blockchain technology is also inefficient, and can be [environmentally harmful](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/bill-gates-says-bitcoin-sucks>).

And to many others, the NFT market [will always be overshadowed](<https://www.wired.com/story/nfts-boom-collectors-shell-out-crypto/>) by the one for physical art.

There's always the chance that this is all a fad that will go away, particularly when we're able to visit art collections and museums in person again once the pandemic eventually comes to a close.

But the immediate excitement over a new approach to art collection has already infected the minds of some very influential — and wealthy — people in the art space.

Does that mean we'll still be talking about NFTs as much as we are right now in a matter of years? That's arguably unlikely. When was the last time you heard about [CryptoKitties](<https://futurism.com/cryptokitties-euthereum-bitcoin-value-beanie-babies>)?

**READ MORE:** [Beeple sold an NFT for $69 million](<https://www.theverge.com/2021/3/11/22325054/beeple-christies-nft-sale-cost-everydays-69-million>) \[*The Verge*\]

## Author
I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/vtanger.bsky.social>)