---
title: "Genes Aren’t Actually the Blueprint of Life, Experts Say"
description: "For decades, most people have believed that genes are the blueprint for life — but that perception, a pair of experts argue, falls short."
date: "2024-02-06"
modified: "2024-02-06"
authors:
  - name: "Noor Al-Sibai"
    job_title: "Senior Staff Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/nooralsibai"
url: "https://futurism.com/neoscope/genes-not-blueprint-life"
categories:
  - "DNA"
  - "Genetics"
  - "Health & Medicine"
tags:
  - "dna"
  - "genes"
  - "genetics"
  - "proteins"
---

# Genes Aren’t Actually the Blueprint of Life, Experts Say

![For decades, most people have believed that genes are the blueprint for life — but that perception, a pair of experts argue, falls short.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/genes-not-blueprint-life.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Getty / Futurism\</em\>*

Since the [human genome was first sequenced](<https://www.nature.com/articles/35057062>), popular science has dictated that genes act as a blueprint for life — but the reality, experts are now arguing, is much more complex and beautiful.

In a new book titled "[How Life Works: A User’s Guide to the New Biology](<https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo207403562.html>)," British science writer and author Phillip Ball writes that the modern conception of genes as hard-and-fast cogs in the machine of life doesn't at all jive with what geneticists have learned in the intervening years: that life is a messy mystery, and the genetics encoding it are its enigmatic and chaotic instruments.

In a review of the book [published by the journal *Nature*](<https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00327-x>), where Ball happens to be a longtime editor, [decorated British biologist Denis Noble](<https://royalsociety.org/people/denis-noble-12007/>) quoted his fellow science writer as saying that the concept of life as a machine is a "lazy metaphor."

Instead, as both writers assert, there's a lot of "fuzziness and imprecision" in the way genes work. Scientists now believe, for instance, that [up to 70 percent](<https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/905990>) of protein domains, or the strings of amino acids on the ladder steps of DNA, could be disordered, omeaning they act in diverse and surprising ways that often stump even expert scientists.

That disordering makes proteins "versatile communicators," Ball insists — but also makes them complicated to pin down in the black-and-white thinking of genetics as a "blueprint" for life.

In one telling example, Noble noted that there are nearly 300 genes indicating a risk for schizophrenia, which throws water in the face of a simplistic conception of [genetic risk for mental illness](<https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/wps.20894>). Enter the old [nature versus nurture](<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8922370/>) argument, but with a twist: everything from [maternal diet](<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3970193/>) to whether a given person [lives in an area with significant pollution](<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412023005755>) as environmental risk factors for the disorder, and you start to see that gene expression has no hard and fast switch.

Perceptions of biology don't need to be radically shifted, both Ball and Noble contend. Rather, scientists need to help the public understand that genes are not simply one thing or another, but ever-changing parts of what makes life so fascinating.

Ultimately, as Noble quotes Ball, "we are at the beginning of a profound rethinking of how life works."

**More on changing perceptions:** [*23andMe Has Lost Billions, Almost Worthless Now*](<https://futurism.com/neoscope/23andme-almost-worthless>)

## Author
At Futurism, I've often been drawn to unpacking the narratives that underlie technological, scientific and medical progress, with a special interest in areas of conflict and ambiguity that end up setting agendas and steering the fates of both elites and the hoi polloi. I'm a committed generalist, but I often find myself returning to work involving NASA and the private space sector, the effects of AI on media and society, and the mechanics of the pharmaceutical industry, with a specific focus on the spread of GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy. Prior to Futurism, I worked for publications ranging from Media Matters and Truthdig to Raw Story and Bustle. I'm also the author of "Myspace Scene Queens," a 2024 title in Instar Books' acclaimed "Remember the Internet" series. My work at Futurism has been cited by outlets including the New Yorker, Slate, Nieman Lab, the Verge, the MIT Technology Review, the Sunday Times, and the Daily Beast. I grew up in North Carolina, attended the University of North Carolina at Asheville, and now live in Brooklyn, New York. In my free time, I'm an avid reader and music fan; you can probably find me at a local poetry reading, concert, underground rave, or DJ set. I'm the proud parent of an ineffable orange cat named Mee-Mow.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/noorfromfuturism.bsky.social>)