---
title: "Scientists: COVID-19 Spread Globally for Months Before We Noticed"
description: "New genetic analysis suggests that COVID-19 spread to the U.S. and Europe weeks or even months earlier than official reports say."
date: "2020-05-06"
modified: "2020-05-06"
authors:
  - name: "Dan Robitzski"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/danrobitzski"
url: "https://futurism.com/neoscope/covid19-spread-globally-months-before-noticed"
categories:
  - "Health & Medicine"
  - "Medical"
  - "Pathogens"
  - "Viruses"
tags:
  - "coronavirus"
  - "covid19"
  - "genetics"
  - "medicine"
---

# Scientists: COVID-19 Spread Globally for Months Before We Noticed

![New genetic analysis suggests that COVID-19 spread to the U.S. and Europe weeks or even months earlier than official reports say.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/covid19-spread-globally-months-before-noticed.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: NIAID/Victor Tangermann\</em\>*

The U.S. government didn't [officially confirm](<https://futurism.com/neoscope/south-korea-coronavirus-us>) its first case of COVID-19 until January 21**.** But new genetic research suggests that by then, it could have already been spreading for weeks — and maybe even months.

That new timeline matches existing reports that U.S. intelligence warned political leaders of a possible pandemic [back in November](<https://futurism.com/neoscope/us-intelligence-warned-cataclysmic-coronavirus-november>), but it's difficult to ascertain the exact day or even month that the coronavirus reached the U.S., [according to *CNN*](<https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/05/health/genetics-coronavirus-spread-study/index.html>).

"All these ideas about trying to find a Patient Zero are pointless because there are so many patient zeros," Francois Balloux, a geneticist at University College London, told *CNN*.

Balloux [published research](<https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567134820301829>) on the genetic diversity and mutations of the coronavirus in the journal *Infection, Genetics, and Evolution* on Tuesday. The study pushed back against the notion that SARS-CoV-2 — that's the actual virus that causes COVID-19 — had mutated into a more virulent strain.

Instead, the study concluded that some degree of mutation is to be expected as viruses replicate themselves within a host — and the mutations identified by the researchers strongly support the hypothesis that it started infecting people in late 2019.

"The virus is changing, but this in itself does not mean it's getting worse," Balloux told *CNN*.

While the research suggests that the coronavirus was spreading in the U.S. and Europe well before it official reports claim, it also reaffirms that the virus spread to humans in late 2019, dashing hopes that populations were already developing herd immunity.

"This rules out any scenario that assumes SARS-CoV-2 may have been in circulation long before it was identified, and hence have already infected large proportions of the population," Balloux told *CNN*. "Everyone was hoping for that. I was too."

## Author
Dan Robitzki is a senior reporter for Futurism, where he likes to cover AI, tech ethics, and medicine. He spends his extra time fencing and streaming games from Los Angeles, California.

### Author social links  
[Twitter](<https://x.com/danrobitzski>)