---
title: "MIT Researcher: Don’t Ignore the Possibility That AI Is Becoming Conscious"
description: "Amid a maelstrom about AI consciousness, one MIT data scientist has highlighted that the concept might not be so far-fetched. "
date: "2022-02-16"
modified: "2022-02-17"
authors:
  - name: "Noor Al-Sibai"
    job_title: "Senior Staff Writer"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/nooralsibai"
url: "https://futurism.com/mit-researcher-conscious-ai"
categories:
  - "Artificial Intelligence"
tags:
  - "agi"
  - "artificial intelligence"
  - "machine learning"
  - "neural networks"
---

# MIT Researcher: Don’t Ignore the Possibility That AI Is Becoming Conscious

![Amid a maelstrom about AI consciousness, one MIT data scientist has highlighted that the concept might not be so far-fetched. ](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/mit-researcher-advanced-neural-networks-consciousness.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Getty Images/Futurism\</em\>*

Amid a maelstrom set off by a prominent AI researcher [saying that some AI may already be achieving limited consciousness](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/openai-already-sentient>), one MIT AI researcher is saying the concept might not be so far-fetched.

Our story starts with Ilya Sutskever, head scientist at the Elon Musk cofounded research group OpenAI. On February 9, [Sutskever tweeted](<https://twitter.com/ilyasut/status/1491554478243258368>) that "it may be that today's large neural networks are slightly conscious."

In response, many [others in the AI research space decried](<https://futurism.com/conscious-ai-backlash>) the OpenAI scientist's claim, suggesting that it was [harming machine learning's reputation](<https://twitter.com/TobyWalsh/status/1492035584684363780>) and amounted to little more than a "[sales pitch](<https://twitter.com/tante/status/1492095659989684225>)" for OpenAI's work.

That backlash has now generated its own clapback from MIT computer scientist Tamay Besiroglu, who's now bucking the trend by coming to Sutskever's defense.

"Seeing so many prominent \[machine learning\] folks ridiculing this idea is disappointing," [Besiroglu tweeted](<https://twitter.com/tamaybes/status/1492609174596898818>). "It makes me less hopeful in the field’s ability to seriously take on some of the profound, weird and important questions that they’ll undoubtedly be faced with over the next few decades."

"I don't actually think we can draw a clear line between models that are 'not conscious' vs 'maybe slightly conscious,'" he said in a followup message. "I'm also not sure any of these models are conscious."

"That said, I do think the question could be a meaningful one that shouldn't just be neglected," he added.

While fears of conscious computers go as far back as the infamous "Maschinenmensch" in 1927's "Metropolis," researchers have repeatedly punted on the concept, saying that it was too far in the future to worry about just yet — and that in any case, misuses of less advanced AI are [already widespread](<https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence-experts-fear>).

That stance explains much of the pushback to Sutskever's claim, which represented one of the first times a credible AI researcher hinted that their creation may have gained some consciousness of its own.

OpenAI — which Sutskever cofounded alongside Musk and the group's current CEO Sam Altman — has in recent years gained notoriety for making GPT-3, a sophisticated text generating algorithm that's caused controversy after [users exploited it](<https://twitter.com/tamaybes/status/1492609174596898818>) in some [pretty grotesque ways](<https://futurism.com/the-byte/ai-role-play-abuse-children>).

AI has advanced so rapidly in recent years that many humans, whose advanced intelligence capabilities evolved [many tens of thousands of years ago](<https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/essential-timeline-understanding-evolution-homo-sapiens-180976807/>), seem to be struggling with the dizzying concept of conscious computers.

If nothing else, this iteration of the conscious AI debate could well be pushing the boundaries of what constitutes consciousness — and may, ultimately, play a role in how we come to define it.

*Updated with comment from Besiroglu and to remove a facetious tweet.*

**More on the debate:** *[Researchers Furious Over Claim That AI Is Already Conscious](<https://futurism.com/conscious-ai-backlash>)*

## Author
At Futurism, I've often been drawn to unpacking the narratives that underlie technological, scientific and medical progress, with a special interest in areas of conflict and ambiguity that end up setting agendas and steering the fates of both elites and the hoi polloi. I'm a committed generalist, but I often find myself returning to work involving NASA and the private space sector, the effects of AI on media and society, and the mechanics of the pharmaceutical industry, with a specific focus on the spread of GLP-1 drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy. Prior to Futurism, I worked for publications ranging from Media Matters and Truthdig to Raw Story and Bustle. I'm also the author of "Myspace Scene Queens," a 2024 title in Instar Books' acclaimed "Remember the Internet" series. My work at Futurism has been cited by outlets including the New Yorker, Slate, Nieman Lab, the Verge, the MIT Technology Review, the Sunday Times, and the Daily Beast. I grew up in North Carolina, attended the University of North Carolina at Asheville, and now live in Brooklyn, New York. In my free time, I'm an avid reader and music fan; you can probably find me at a local poetry reading, concert, underground rave, or DJ set. I'm the proud parent of an ineffable orange cat named Mee-Mow.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/noorfromfuturism.bsky.social>)