---
title: "Ungrateful Google Plebes Somehow Not Excited to Work on Military Industrial Complex Death Machines"
description: "Google's employees are outraged over the company's shady dealings with the military."
date: "2018-04-05"
modified: "2018-04-05"
authors:
  - name: "Victor Tangermann"
    job_title: "Senior Editor"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor"
url: "https://futurism.com/google-maven-drones-military-contract"
categories:
  - "Artificial Intelligence"
  - "Google"
  - "Military"
  - "Science & Energy"
---

# Ungrateful Google Plebes Somehow Not Excited to Work on Military Industrial Complex Death Machines

![](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/google-military-drones.png>)
*\<em\>Image: \<a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MQ-9_Reaper_-_090609-F-0000M-777.JPG#/media/File:MQ-9_Reaper_-_090609-F-0000M-777.JPG" target="\_blank"\>Paul Ridgeway / Emily Cho\</a\>\</em\>*

"Don't Be Evil" has been one of Google's corporate maxims for over 15 years. But it's recent dealings with the Department of Defense has put that ideal on ice. For some reason, Google's workers aren't psyched about this!

Over three thousand Google employees signed a [recent public letter](<https://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/technology/googleletter.pdfhttps://static01.nyt.com/files/2018/technology/googleletter.pdf>) demanding CEO Sundar Pichai shut down Project Maven — a Department of Defense contract to create a "customized AI surveillance engine" — and publicize a clear policy that "neither Google nor its contractors will ever build warfare technology."

The letter's got some pretty direct language, calling the company out on its loss of the aforementioned core value: "Google’s unique history, its motto *Don’t Be Evil*, and its direct reach into the lives of billions of users set it apart." The commoditization of people's personal data (ergo, their psyches) not withstanding, obviously.

Gizmodo [reported on Project Maven](<https://gizmodo.com/google-is-helping-the-pentagon-build-ai-for-drones-1823464533>) earlier last month, when they described it as "using machine learning to identify vehicles and other objects in drone footage, taking that burden off analysts." Google and the Pentagon fired back, stating that the technology [wouldn't be used](<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/technology/google-letter-ceo-pentagon-project.html>) to create an autonomous weapons system that can identify targets and fire without a human squeezing the trigger.

CEO Pichai spun the letter and public exchange with the company as "hugely important and beneficial" in a [statement to the New York Times](<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/technology/google-letter-ceo-pentagon-project.html>), but of course, didn't refer to any plans to throw the brakes on the project. Pichai's statement went on to say that the tech used by the Pentagon is available to "any Google Cloud customer" and reserved specifically for "non-offensive purposes."

Thing is, [Google's far from](<https://futurism.com/google-blockchain-based-cloud-storage>) the only tech industry player in cahoots with the military. Red flags immediately went up when news broke that a team of researchers from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) was [partnering up with weapons company Hanwha Systems](<https://gizmodo.com/winner-of-darpa-robot-competition-partners-with-defense-1825006939>) — a company that produces cluster bombs, not exactly a popular form of warfare, as far as these things go. Fifty researchers from thirty countries called for an immediate boycott of the Korean institute.

Microsoft and Amazon both signed [multi billion dollar contracts](<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXnl9y3jqwg>) with the Department of Defense to develop cloud services. Credit where it's due: At least the DOD isn't trying to spin this as anything other than death machine-making. Defense Department chief management officer John Gibson didn't beat around the bush when he said the collaboration was designed in part to [“increase lethality and readiness.”](<https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/technology/google-letter-ceo-pentagon-project.html>)

So that's fun! And if Google's recent advancements in AI tech faced a similar fate, think: Weaponized autonomous drones, equipped with private data, and a sophisticated AI. Not saying this is exactly how SkyNet starts, but, this is basically how SkyNet starts.

The counter to this argument, insomuch as there is one, is that these technological developments lead to better data, and better data leads to better object identification technology, which could also lead to more precise offensives, which could lead (theoretically) to less civilian casualties, or at least (again, theoretically) increased accountability on the part of the military (analog: the calculator should make it exponentially more difficult to get numbers "wrong" on your taxes, so the automated hyper-targeted death robots should make it exponentially more difficult to "accidentally" murder a school full of children).

All of which should go without saying that collaboration between the Department of Defense and various Silicon Valley tech companies is a dangerous game, and we have seen how quickly the balance can tilt in one direction. Having informed tech employees call out their CEOs publicly could hopefully lead to tech companies choosing their military contracts more carefully, or at least, more light being shed on who's making what technologies, or rather, what technologies Silicon Valley coders are unknowingly working on.

More likely is that it just results in these companies being more discreet about the gobstoppingly shady (but profitable!) death machine work they're doing. Good thing — like the rest of the world with a brain in their heads — [we're all ears](<mailto:victor@futurism.com>).

## Author
I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/vtanger.bsky.social>)