--- title: "Andreessen Horowitz Partner Quit Firm, Horrified by What His Old Colleagues Are Doing to Humankind" description: "Former Andreessen Horowitz partner John O'Farrell quit the firm in May, warning that his colleagues are putting AI hype over humanity." date: "2026-06-13" modified: "2026-06-13" authors: - name: "Joe Wilkins" job_title: "Correspondent" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/jwilkins" url: "https://futurism.com/future-society/andreessen-horowitz-partner-quit-ai-ethics" categories: - "Artificial Intelligence" - "Ethics" - "Finance" - "Future Society" - "Investing" --- # Andreessen Horowitz Partner Quit Firm, Horrified by What His Old Colleagues Are Doing to Humankind ![A photo illustration featuring a cut out of Andreesen Horowitz partner Marc Andreesen smiling.]() *Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Justin Sullivan / Getty Images* Billionaire tech financier Marc Andreessen is facing some dissent awfully close to home. In a blustery [*New York Times* essay](), John O'Farrell — former general partner at the mammoth investment firm Andreessen Horowitz — chastised his former colleagues in the tech industry for putting AI hype before the common good. As the first outside general partner ever hired by Andreessen Horowitz in 2010, O'Farrell's departure is significant, and his warning for his former colleagues is telling. "Some of the most powerful players in AI — led by some of my friends and former partners, to my great sadness — have raised hundreds of millions of dollars to forestall a more serious and meaningful debate about how AI should be governed," O'Farrell wrote. "They have helped create political action committees to help defeat candidates who want strict regulations on AI and to promote those who can be counted on to stay out of their way. I believe this is a huge mistake." At the core of O'Farrell's complaint is the fact that tech firms and their financial backers have invested unfathomable sums of money in an attempt to influence [top US politicians]() who should, in a better system, be impartially regulating AI. "I believe this attempted political infiltration by the AI industry will fail," O'Farrell explained. "A backlash is building, and it will become fiercer when voters learn that a handful of billionaires are altogether spending nine figures, apparently in an effort to try to stop debates about regulation from further developing." Continuing, the former partner explained that he'd been approached by groups interested in exposing the tech industry's effort to "buy political influence," adding that he "may contribute my own money to these public awareness efforts." In an economy overwhelmingly driven [by AI hype](), O'Farrell's defection is laudable — and a welcome sign that not everybody is as smitten with the buzzy new tech as it might seem, even longtime insiders at the nexus of tech and finance. **More on Marc Andreessen:** *[Marc Andreessen Sputters Incomprehensibly at Question About How AI Will Actually Benefit Humankind]()* ## Author At Futurism, I focus on the intersection of technology and power — examining the economics, history, and politics behind today’s dystopian headlines. As a writer, I’m interested in topics ranging from AI’s impact on labor to startups nobody asked for. My prior work includes bylines in Jacobin, Verso, and Blue Labyrinths. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Forbes, The Guardian, MIT Technology Review, Time, The Nation, Mother Jones, The Verge, and Wired. I grew up in Michigan, attending Central Michigan University as well as Ball State University, where I earned a master of music. I now live in Brooklyn with my girlfriend and our cat Ziti. On weekends, you can find me hunched over a cold pint arguing geopolitics with the other transplants. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()