---
title: "The FBI Forced A Suspect To Unlock His iPhone With His Face"
description: "The FBI forced a child abuse suspect to unlock his iPhone X using Face ID. But should law enforcement have the right to do that?"
date: "2018-10-01"
modified: "2018-10-01"
authors:
  - name: "Victor Tangermann"
    job_title: "Senior Editor"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor"
url: "https://futurism.com/fbi-unlock-iphone-face"
categories:
  - "Computing"
  - "Devices"
  - "Robots and Machines"
tags:
  - "apple"
  - "biometric data"
  - "biometric security"
  - "faceid"
  - "FBI"
  - "iPhone"
  - "touchid"
---

# The FBI Forced A Suspect To Unlock His iPhone With His Face

![The FBI forced a child abuse suspect to unlock his iPhone X using Face ID. But should law enforcement have the right to do that?](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/fbi-forced-suspect-unlock-iphone-with-face.png>)
*\<em\>Image: \<a href="https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/news-photo/customer-sets-up-face-id-on-his-new-iphone-x-at-the-apple-news-photo/869828310" target="\_blank"\>ELIJAH NOUVELAGE/AFP/Getty Images\</a\>\</em\>*

## CAN'T LOOK AWAY

The advent of FaceID, a feature that lets iPhone owners log into their devices using facial recognition, means it's never been easier to unlock a smartphone — all you've gotta do is look at the camera. But the technology also makes it easier for police to access data stored on suspects' phones, raising thorny new legal questions.

Take the case of Ohio resident Grant Michalski. *Forbes* [reports that](<https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2018/09/30/feds-force-suspect-to-unlock-apple-iphone-x-with-their-face/>) the FBI raided Michalski's home in August, on suspicion that he'd sent and received child pornography. Then investigators forced Michalski to unlock his personal iPhone X using FaceID, allowing them to access his chats and photos. It's the first documented case of its kind.

## BIOMETRIC INSECURITY

The battle over whether law enforcement should be able to access suspects' phones is hotly contested.

In 2016, the FBI tried to [get into the iPhone of one of the shooters](<https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2016/02/18/fbi-fingerprint-iphone-apple-san-bernardino-attacks/#1d49021a33a0>) who perpetrated the 2015 terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. The attackers were killed in a shootout with police, but officials wanted information off the one suspect's phone to find out if the couple had accomplices or had been planning further attacks. The phone was protected by a pass code that only allowed a limited number of login attempts. The FBI asked Apple for help, but the tech giant didn't comply with requests.

Also in 2016, the FBI tried to [access the iPhone](<http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-iphones-fingerprints-20160430-story.html>) of an alleged gang member in California. This time, prosecutors wanted the suspect to provide a fingerprint to unlock the iPhone using TouchID, which a Los Angeles judge granted. But the next year, a federal judge in Chicago [rejected a request](<http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-forced-fingerprinting-iphones-met-20170305-story.html>) to force suspects to provide their fingerprints to unlock a personal device.

## FACING JUSTICE

We use phones to store some of the most intimate details of our lives. It might seem like a good, legal plan to allow the FBI to force a child porn suspect like Michalski to give up his data. But what if that decision weakens rights for the rest of us?

One thing is for sure: this case is bound to rekindle that discussion.

**MORE ON THE FACEID UNLOCKING CASE: [Feds Force Suspect To Unlock An Apple iPhone X With Their Face](<https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2018/09/30/feds-force-suspect-to-unlock-apple-iphone-x-with-their-face/#2be2eb751259>)** \[*Forbes*\]

***Read More: [When Can Law Enforcement Look at Your Devices? A Definitive List](<https://futurism.com/law-enforcement-mobile-devices-search>)***

## Author
I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/vtanger.bsky.social>)