--- title: "Elon Musk Seems to Be Trying to Weasel Out of Vote to Resign" description: "Twitter CEO Elon Musk's latest poll asking his millions of followers whether he should step down is seriously flawed for a number of reasons." date: "2022-12-20" modified: "2022-12-20" authors: - name: "Victor Tangermann" job_title: "Senior Editor" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor" url: "https://futurism.com/elon-musk-vote-resign" categories: - "Elon Musk" - "Future Society" - "The Industrialists" tags: - "elon musk" - "twitter" --- # Elon Musk Seems to Be Trying to Weasel Out of Vote to Resign ![Twitter CEO Elon Musk's latest poll asking his millions of followers whether he should step down is seriously flawed for a number of reasons.]() *\Image: Getty Images/Futurism\* Twitter CEO Elon Musk has a long track record of [failing to keep his promises]() — and his [latest poll](), saying he'd step down as CEO of the spiraling social media company if his followers asked him to, may be no exception. His poll comes after many weeks of [mayhem](), [knee-jerk decision making](), and [baffling policy changes]() that have greatly eroded Twitter's already imperfect brand. Its result? A resounding 57.5 percent, or roughly 10 million accounts, said he should step down. Musk fell uncharacteristically silent following the results of the poll, suggesting the outcome may have caught him off guard. Now, though, he seems to be finding ways to weasel out of the results. "Interesting," he [said](), in response to a claim that the poll may have been skewed by fake accounts. The argument is frankly laughable. It's not even the first time Musk has used bots as an excuse, after trying to [use them]() to evade his cursed $44 billion offer to buy the company in the first place. Logistically, why would he have run the poll if he already though fake accounts could have swayed the results? Besides, isn't polling your own followers inherently biased anyways for a place that is meant to be a "[digital town square]()," to use Musk's own words? To be clear, Musk can do what he pleases with Twitter, since he owns the company. But this wanton disregard for the will of his own users couldn't be further from his [original vision]() of Twitter as a place "where a wide range of beliefs can be debated in a healthy manner," nevermind his [mostly-abandoned commitment to free speech](). Then there's the fact that Musk [already promised]() a judge that he would "find somebody else to run Twitter over time" making his poll a foregone conclusion. Musk would also still own Twitter, meaning that he'd still be calling the shots with another CEO in place. None of this comes as a huge surprise. The billionaire CEO has made several major decisions using flawed Twitter polls in the past, from deciding [whether to sell Tesla stock]() to [restoring former US president Donald Trump's Twitter account](). In another poll, he didn't like the results, and ran it again — with the [same outcome](). Where all of this leaves the future of the company is as hazy as ever. By the end of the evening, Musk had even suggested that only those who pay the company $8 a month should be able to vote in policy related polls, as one user [suggested](). "Good point," he [replied](). "Twitter will make that change." Needless to say, locking the rest of Twitter users out is only going to further insulate Twitter as Musk's seedy, self-serving personal playground. At this stage, it's starting to look like Musk has lost interest in running Twitter and is desperately looking for a vaguely dignified exit. But finding a new CEO who will abide by his rash and impulsive decisions may take a little while. But even with a new CEO at the helm of Twitter, the company's erratic days are far from numbered. **READ MORE:** [Elon Musk breaks silence after 10 million Twitter users vote for him to step down]() \[*The Guardian*\] **More on Elon:** *[It Turns Out Elon Musk’s Stalking Incident Had Nothing to Do With ElonJet]()* ## Author I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()