--- title: "Chinese Scientists Say They Now Have the World’s Most Powerful Quantum Computer" description: "Chinese researchers have claimed a new record in quantum computing, beating Google. Learn more about the Zuchongzhi quantum computer here." date: "2021-07-06" modified: "2021-07-14" authors: - name: "Victor Tangermann" job_title: "Senior Editor" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor" url: "https://futurism.com/chinese-scientists-most-powerful-quantum-computer" categories: - "Computing" - "Quantum Computing" - "Robots and Machines" tags: - "china" - "quantum computers" - "quantum computing" - "qubits" --- # Chinese Scientists Say They Now Have the World’s Most Powerful Quantum Computer ![A Chinese team of researchers have claimed a new record in quantum computing, arguing its 66 qubit quantum computer is the most powerful in the world.]() *\Image: University of Science and Technology of China\* A team of researchers in China has claimed a new record in quantum computing, saying its new computer is far more powerful than any that came before it — including the best effort by the megacorporation Google. In [a preprint]() uploaded to *arXiv*, the researchers claim their quantum computer was able to solve a problem using 56 out of its 66 qubits, the quantum equivalent of bits in a conventional computer. That's a step up from Google's Sycamore processor, which only has 54 qubits. In 2019, Google claimed its computer was the [first to achieve quantum supremacy](), the threshold beyond which quantum computers are able to solve problems that elude classical computers. Google claimed its computer solved a problem in less than 3.5 minutes, something that would've taken the most powerful conventional supercomputer 10,000 years to do. The Chinese team didn't go quite that far in its new paper. "We estimate that the sampling task finished by Zuchongzhi in about 1.2 hours \[or 70 minutes\] will take the most powerful supercomputer at least eight years," the team wrote in its paper. "The computational cost of the classical simulation of this task is estimated to be 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than the previous work on 53-qubit Sycamore processor." The problem the computer was solving was around 100 times more difficult to solve than the one solved by Google's Sycamore, according to the researchers. It's a powerful hint of what quantum computers could soon be capable of, but their success needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Case in point, this latest paper has yet to be peer-reviewed. Besides, as has been the case for pretty much all quantum computers so far, use cases are still extremely specialized, meaning that they won't be replacing their binary predecessors any time soon. The team's Zuchongzhi system is a two-dimensional programmable computer that can manipulate up to 66 qubits. In other words, it can encode quantum information, the quantum state of a single electron, across 66 quantum bits. Last year, a team made up of many of the same members [demonstrated a quantum computer with 76 photonic qubits](), qubits that store information about the charge state of photons. That computer, however, was not programmable like Zuchongzhi, as [*Cosmos Magazine* points out](). In other words, it was hardwired to complete the target calculation. So what was the problem Zuchongzhi solved? The computer sampled the output distribution of random quantum circuits, as *Cosmos* puts it, a highly complex problem that has proved unsolvable for classical supercomputers. In other words, it's an excellent benchmark for the current crop of quantum computers. While the usefulness of such calculations has yet to really be translated for use in the real world, scientists were impressed by the results. "I’m very excited by this," Peter Knight at Imperial College London, who was not involved in the research, [told *New Scientist*](). "What this has done is really demonstrate what we’ve always thought we knew, but didn’t have proved experimentally, that you can always beat a classical machine by adding a few more qubits." **READ MORE:** [China beats Google to claim the world's most powerful quantum computer]() \[*New Scientist*\] **More on quantum computers:** [Microsoft Retracts Paper Claiming Quantum Computing Breakthrough]() ## Author I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()