--- title: "Blockchain Company Sets Priceless Banksy Painting on Fire to Create an NFT" description: "An original Banksy painting was lit on fire and sold as an NFT. Find out why burning this Banksy piece is ironic and causing controversy." date: "2021-03-12" modified: "2021-03-17" authors: - name: "Victor Tangermann" job_title: "Senior Editor" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor" url: "https://futurism.com/blockchain-banksy-painting-fire-nft" categories: - "Blockchain" - "Future Society" - "NFTs" tags: - "art" - "blockchain" - "nfts" - "non-fungible tokens" --- # Blockchain Company Sets Priceless Banksy Painting on Fire to Create an NFT ![An original by world famous street artist Banksy was lit on fire during a livestream — and promptly sold for $380,000 worth of Ethereum as an NFT.]() *\Image: Injective Protocol\* An original by world famous street artist Banksy was lit on fire during a livestream — and promptly sold for $380,000 worth of Ethereum as a non-fungible token (NFT), the [*BBC* reports](). Ironically, the artwork, titled "Morons," is a critique of the fine art market itself. The black and white print shows an auctioneer at the auction house Christie's, the same auction that [sold an NFT for $69 million]() earlier this week. Next to the auctioneer is a framed image with the caption: "I can’t believe you morons actually buy this." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4wm-p_VFh0 In case you need a quick primer, NFTs allow collectors to claim ownership over a digital work of art. You can think of it as a kind of blockchain-based passport or a representation of a given digital asset. It's meant to signify original ownership, even if the piece has already been copied a million times before. The trend has taken the fine art market by storm over the last couple months, culminating in digital artist Beeple selling his "The First 5000 Days" piece for a cool $69 million at Christie's. Critics of the Banksy-burning livestream called it out for being wasteful and tasteless. "It's a total stunt, playing off the fact that these things are going for big money," Ossian Ward, author of the book "Ways of Looking: How to Experience Contemporary Art," told the *BBC*. "You can say anything is a work of art," Ward added, "but if you burn a Banksy and then want money for it, that ranks pretty low on the art scale for me." The people behind the burning, however, call the stunt "an expression of art itself," as Mirza Uddin, the spokesman for Injective Protocol, the blockchain company behind the stunt, told the British broadcaster. "We specifically chose a Banksy piece since he has previously shredded one of his own artworks at an auction," Uddin added. Injective Protocol is already planning its next steps. "We’re already planning our next event in collaboration with a prominent artist," Uddin [told CoinDesk](). "Our aim is to bridge the world of traditional art with the world of NFTs. So, we’ll definitely be doing more to uphold this ethos." The burning is a great example of the versatility of NFTs. The whole concept is meant to demonstrate that art ownership can take on many different forms, including an ownership stake listed on the blockchain. It allows for a monetary value to be set for not just a physical representation, in the form of a framed painting or three-dimensional sculpture, but something more abstract as well. There are no guarantees, however; purchasing NFTs come with some inherent risks. The cryptocurrencies used to make the purchase are likely to fluctuate wildly, as they always have done. It's still far too early to tell whether NFTs are the future of digital art collection. But when Banksys are already being sacrificed for the cause, more paintings are bound to land on the chopping block next. **READ MORE:** [Banksy art burned, destroyed and sold as token in 'money-making stunt']() **More on NFTs:** *[An NFT Painting Just Sold For $69 Million]()* ## Author I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()