--- title: "Provost of Dartmouth Busted Using AI for His Own Writing in Newspapers and Academic Journals" description: "Dartmouth College provost Santiago Schnell was busted by his own students for using AI in his academic and opinion writing." date: "2026-09-26" modified: "2026-09-26" authors: - name: "Frank Landymore" job_title: "Contributing Writer" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/flandymore.md" url: "https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/provost-dartmouth-busted-ai-newspapers-academic-journals" categories: - "Artificial Intelligence" - "Education" - "Future Society" --- # Provost of Dartmouth Busted Using AI for His Own Writing in Newspapers and Academic Journals ![A photo illustration of Dartmouth provost Santiago Schnell.]() *Eudoro Lopez via Wikimedia Commons / Futurism* Dartmouth College provost Santiago Schnell is facing a bit of a reckoning right now after being busted for using AI to write articles that were published in newspapers and academic journals — with some students calling for him to be fired. The accusations first came from a broader [*Semafor* investigation]() published last month that looked into how many guest opinion pieces in the US's top newspapers were written with AI. One of Schnell's [columns]() in *The Washington Post*, when put through the widely-cited AI detector Pangram, came up as 100 percent AI-written. The article's topic, in a detail rich with irony, was [AI cheating in colleges](). That sparked a [follow-up investigation]() by the university's student-run paper, *The Dartmouth*, which examined Schnell's published work before and after the public release of ChatGPT in November 2022. Using Pangram, it found that all his works written before that date all came up as 100 percent human written, while a selection of nine of his published works after that date came up with a median score of 96 percent AI written. In a statement to *The Dartmouth*, Schnell fessed up to using chatbots in his writing process, though he still claimed ultimate authorship over his manuscripts and insisted that AI only had a modest influence on the final product, using it solely for tweaks like "language refinement" and copyediting. "I develop ideas and arguments, conduct the research, evaluate the evidence and sources, determine the structure, prepare drafts and decide what appears in the final text," Schnell wrote. "I regard these technologies as assistive tools," he continued, adding that they were no "substitute for my research, intellectual judgment or authorship." In another ironic twist pointed out by the student journalists, Schnell's statement also came back as 100 hundred AI-written. Asked to explain himself out of this one, Schnell wrote a follow-up saying he first wrote a draft and then "used an Al tool to assist with language and clarity," and so forth and so forth. "I am fully responsible for any text under my signature," he asserted. Students weren't buying Schnell's explanations. A day after *The Dartmouth* released its investigation, it also [published a fiery piece]() by its opinion editor Eli Moyse, a government and creative writing major, excoriating Schnell's actions and calling in the headline to "Fire Provost Santiago Schnell." Calling Schnell's AI usage an "insult," Moyse zeroed in how secretly using AI in his published writing — including in a piece about AI cheating, as a reminder— was an offense that, if committed by a student, would be treated as a serious academic infraction. "If students at Dartmouth used AI to write an entire paper without acknowledgement and then submitted it to their professor, they would be in clear violation of the Academic Honor Principle," Moyse wrote. "I would argue that Provost Schnell's job is one of the most respected in all of academia," he continued. "So, if he has been using AI as extensively as is suspected, his decision to do so to write an article published in a newspaper of record is an incredible, almost unbelievable insult to our community and to the readership of the *Washington Post*." **More on AI:** *[Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says That Sacrificing Our Children’s Minds to AI Is a Price He’s Willing to Pay]()* ## Author At Futurism, my work has often centered on bringing a sense of clarity and insight to complex topics ranging from the regulation of emerging technologies to the esoteric ideologies of Silicon Valley executives, while striving not to lose the poetic sense of awe inspired by often-obscure fields like astrophysics and quantum computing. I broke the story of CNET using AI to produce articles that turned out to be riddled with factual errors and plagiarism — a dam-breaking inflection point, as I've reported, that's inspired copycats and endless discourse while beguiling stakeholders ranging from tech giants to purveyors of spam around the web. My work at Futurism has been cited by publications including CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, Vice, Gizmodo, Engadget, the Verge, and Vanity Fair. I grew up in locales ranging from India to China, and now live in the exotic suburbs of Virginia. In my free time, I'm an avid reader of weird sci-fi literature, an aficionado of East Asian cinema, and, regrettably, a relapsed gamer. Allegedly, I’m working on a debut novel, currently untitled. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()