--- title: "Pentagon Issues Threat to Anthropic" description: "Trump administration officials are now considering cutting ties with Anthropic over the company's limits on its contract." date: "2026-02-17" modified: "2026-02-17" authors: - name: "Victor Tangermann" job_title: "Senior Editor" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/victor" url: "https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/pentagon-issues-threat-anthropic" categories: - "Anthropic" - "Artificial Intelligence" - "Ethics" --- # Pentagon Issues Threat to Anthropic ![Trump administration officials are now considering cutting ties with Anthropic over the company's limits on its contract.]() *Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images* Over the weekend, the [*Wall Street Journal* reported]() that the US military had used Anthropic's Claude AI chatbot for its invasion of Venezuela and kidnapping of the country's president Nicolás Maduro. The exact details of Claude's use remain hazy, but the incident demonstrated the Pentagon's prioritization of the use of AI, and how tools available to the public may already be involved in military operations. And when Anthropic learned about it, its response was icy. An Anthropic spokesperson remained tight-lipped on whether "Claude, or any other AI model, was used for any specific operation, classified or otherwise" in a statement to the *WSJ*, but noted that "any use of Claude — whether in the private sector or across government — is required to comply with our Usage Policies, which govern how Claude can be deployed." The deployment reportedly occurred through the AI company's [partnership with the shadowy military contractor Palantir](). Anthropic also [signed an up to $200 million contract]() with the Pentagon last summer as part of the military's broader adoption of the tech, alongside OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini, and xAI's Grok. Whether the Pentagon's use of Claude broke any of Anthropic's rules remains unclear. Claude's [usage guidelines]() forbid it from being used to "facilitate or promote any act of violence," "develop or design weapons," or "surveillance." Either way, Trump administration officials are now considering cutting ties with Anthropic over the company's insistence that mass surveillance of Americans and fully autonomous weaponry remain off limits, [*Axios* reports](). "Everything's on the table," including a dialing back of the partnership, a senior administration official told *Axios*. "But there'll have to be an orderly replacement \[for\] them, if we think that's the right answer." As if that phrasing wasn't strong enough, a senior official — it's unclear if it's the same one — followed up with an [even more pugnacious remark](). "It will be an enormous pain in the ass to disentangle, and we are going to make sure they pay a price for forcing our hand like this," they told the site. Anthropic reportedly reached out to Palantir to figure out whether Claude was used during the attacks on Venezuela, according to *Axio**s'* sourcing, in signs of a broader culture clash and growing concerns of the tech being implicated in military operations. Late last month, Anthropic already clashed over the limits of its $200 million contract with the Pentagon, including how many law enforcement agencies, such as Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, could deploy it, [per prior reporting by the *WSJ*](). Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has repeatedly warned of the [inherent risks]() of the tech his company is working on, calling for more government oversight, regulation, and guardrails. He has also raised concerns over AI being used by autonomous lethal operations and domestic surveillance. In a [lengthy essay]() posted earlier this year, Amodei [argued]() that large-scale AI-facilitated surveillance should be considered a crime against humanity. Meanwhile, defense secretary Pete Hegseth doesn't appear to share these hangups. Earlier this year, he [promised]() that the Pentagon wouldn't "employ AI models that won't allow you to fight wars," a comment that sources told the *WSJ* concerned discussions with Anthropic. Anthropic continues to insist that it's "committed to using frontier AI in support of US national security" in a statement to both the *WSJ* and *Axios*. However, its issues with the Pentagon appear to be going over well with its non-government users, who have been horrified by the tech being implicated in military action. "Good job Anthropic, you just became the top closed \[AI\] company in my books," one [top post reads]() on the Claude subreddit. **More on AI:** [*AI Delusions Are Leading to Domestic Abuse, Harassment, and Stalking*]() ## Author I've been at Futurism since 2017, where my role has evolved to encompass design, writing, and increasingly editing. I've always been fascinated by space exploration and advanced transportation, which I've leaned into by interviewing luminaries in those fields while closely following the dimensions of policy and regulation that allow next-generation projects to succeed -- or, sometimes, to fail. I'm also keenly interested in the effects of generative AI on society, policies, and democratic institutions, as well as clean energy, physics and biology, and the vagaries of tech leadership. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Ars Technica, Gizmodo, PC Magazine, Jalopnik, Fox News, and the New York Post. I spent my childhood living in locations including Manila, the Philippines, and Geneva, Switzerland, attended McGill University, and now live in Toronto, Canada. Before Futurism I worked at AskMen and a small photography studio. In my free time, I'm an avid gardener, foodie, and craft beer lover, as well as a maker of artisanal hot pepper sauces. I have a magnificent dog named Freida. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()