--- title: "Bosses Are Blowing More Money on AI Agents Than It’d Cost Them to Just Pay Human Workers" description: "Some organizings are finding themselves spending more on AI token fees than they do paying human salaries." date: "2026-04-27" modified: "2026-04-27" authors: - name: "Frank Landymore" job_title: "Contributing Writer" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/flandymore" url: "https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/bosses-more-money-ai-agents-human-salary" categories: - "Artificial Intelligence" --- # Bosses Are Blowing More Money on AI Agents Than It’d Cost Them to Just Pay Human Workers ![A futuristic humanoid robot with a glowing blue eye is interacting with a transparent digital screen displaying lines of computer code in bright blue text. The robot's design features a sleek white and metallic body with visible mechanical joints and components, set against a dark blue background.]() *Getty / Futurism* Mindlessly unleashing AI agents to take over employees' jobs can be pretty costly, it turns out. Some companies are learning the hard way that paying for the incredible volume of AI agent requests is costing more than what they'd pay their human employees, [*Axios* reports](). AIs can perform all sorts of tasks, ranging from the rote to the complex. But one of the most popular ways it's being used in the workplace is to generate mountains of code at a pace far greater than a human could achieve. Sometimes, software engineers will even run multiple AI agents at the same time, all working on different tasks in the background without supervision. Each of these tasks costs tokens, and the bill can quickly add up. "For my team, the cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees," Bryan Catanzaro, vice president of applied deep learning at Nvidia, told *Axios*. The problem has become harder to ignore as organizations are increasingly reliant on using AI tools and agents — including the organizations building them. "Pretty much 100 percent" of Anthropic's code is now AI-generated, the company's head of Claude Code Boris Cherny [claimed earlier this year](). Google and Microsoft's bosses claim that this share is around a quarter of their companies' code. Meta employees performance reviews are now [partly based on how much AI they use](), showing that a lot of the push towards using AI is coming from the top. It probably doesn't help that many tech workers [are treating their token bills as member-measuring contests](), using millions of tokens in a single day. The slang for this, we regret to inform you, is "tokenmaxxing," with some power users racking up monthly token bills north of $150,000. "I probably spend more than my salary on Claude," Max Linder, a software engineer in Stockholm, [told *The New York Times* last month](). Uber engineers using Claude Code have already blown through the company's entire 2026 AI budget, [*The Information* reported](). Tech leaders' attempts to grapple with the situation can sound [nearly as comical as the dilemma itself](). In March, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang proposed giving software engineers AI tokens equal to roughly half their base salary, something he said could be used as a recruiting tool. Why be wooed by a signing bonus, when if you work for us, you get to use more AI? At the same time, it's a clear money-making opportunity for AI providers. One OpenAI investor told *Axios* that the concern over token costs could benefit them, since they believe Codex uses tokens more efficiently than Anthropic's Claude Code. Anthropic, meanwhile, has cashed in by raising its pricing. In all, the token costs are just one of many major question marks over AI automation. The jury's still out on whether using error-prone AIs is more efficient and worth the potential havoc they can wreak internally — as evidenced by [incidents at Meta]() and [Amazon](), among others — while [numerous studies suggest]() that forcing workers to use AI tools could actually be making their jobs harder. **More on AI:** [*Devious New AI Tool "Clones" Software So That the Original Creator Doesn’t Hold a Copyright Over the New Version*]() ## Author At Futurism, my work has often centered on bringing a sense of clarity and insight to complex topics ranging from the regulation of emerging technologies to the esoteric ideologies of Silicon Valley executives, while striving not to lose the poetic sense of awe inspired by often-obscure fields like astrophysics and quantum computing. I broke the story of CNET using AI to produce articles that turned out to be riddled with factual errors and plagiarism — a dam-breaking inflection point, as I've reported, that's inspired copycats and endless discourse while beguiling stakeholders ranging from tech giants to purveyors of spam around the web. My work at Futurism has been cited by publications including CBS News, the Los Angeles Times, Vice, Gizmodo, Engadget, the Verge, and Vanity Fair. I grew up in locales ranging from India to China, and now live in the exotic suburbs of Virginia. In my free time, I'm an avid reader of weird sci-fi literature, an aficionado of East Asian cinema, and, regrettably, a relapsed gamer. Allegedly, I’m working on a debut novel, currently untitled. ### Author social links [Bluesky]()