--- title: "AI Use Appears to Have a “Boiling Frog” Effect on Human Cognition, New Study Warns" description: "A new study claims to offer the first causal link between AI dependency and cognitive erosion. Researchers warn of long-term implications." date: "2026-04-14" modified: "2026-04-14" authors: - name: "Maggie Harrison Dupré" job_title: "Senior Staff Writer" link: "https://futurism.com/authors/mharrison" url: "https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-boiling-frog-human-cognition-study" categories: - "Artificial Intelligence" --- # AI Use Appears to Have a “Boiling Frog” Effect on Human Cognition, New Study Warns ![A green frog partially submerged in water, surrounded by numerous water droplets on the surface. The water has a vibrant blue and green tint, creating a striking contrast with the frog's yellow-green skin. The frog's eyes are prominent and detailed.]() *Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Getty Images* In a [new study](), researchers claim to provide the first causal evidence that leaning on AI to assist with "reasoning-intensive" cognitive labor — mental tasks ranging from writing to studying to coding to simply brainstorming new ideas — can rapidly impair users' intellectual ability and willingness to persist despite difficulty. "We find that AI assistance improves immediate performance, but it comes at a heavy cognitive cost," the study declares of its findings. "After just \[about\] 10 minutes of AI-assisted problem-solving, people who lost access to the AI performed worse and gave up more frequently than those who never used it." The study, which was conducted by a multidisciplinary cohort of scientists from across the United States and United Kingdom, has yet to be peer-reviewed. But it builds on a growing body of research suggesting that extensive AI use can [distort]() and [dampen]() users' [thinking]() and [independence](), and as experts work to understand the impacts of widely-used chatbots on people as they unfold in real-time, they're warning that outsourcing cognitive tasks to AI tools could put humans in a "boiling frog" conundrum — in which an unwitting, bit-by-bit erosion of our cognitive "muscles" leads to formidable challenges in the long-term. "If sustained AI use erodes the motivation and persistence that drive long-term learning, these effects will accumulate over years, and by the time they are visible, they will be difficult to reverse," the study urges. "This is analogous to the 'boiling frog' effect, where each incremental act feels costless, until the cumulative effect becomes overwhelming to address." To conduct the study, the researchers recruited a cohort of about 350 Americans, who were asked to try to complete a brief series of fraction equations. A little more than half of participants were randomly granted access to a chatbot — a specialized bot built on OpenAI's GPT-5 and provided with the specific answers for each question on the brief exam — for help. Everyone else was funneled into an AI-free control group. At first, the results revealed, the chatbot proved expedient in helping AI-aided participants breeze through the test. But halfway through the short exam, access to the AI was suddenly cut off — at which point participants' ability to work through the reasoning questions without AI assistance quickly declined, as did their will to keep working at a problem when the going got tough. For a follow-up experiment, the researchers recruited another, larger group of nearly 670 participants. They were once again split into two roughly-equal halves and asked to complete a brief mathematical reasoning test, with one group given access to a chatbot assistant — only to once again be suddenly abandoned by their AI companion, leaving them to cognitively fend for themselves. The results were pretty much the same: performance dropped, as did perseverance. These same outcomes persisted once again in a final experiment, in which about 200 more participants were asked to complete a brief series of reading comprehension questions, showing that such results aren't simply limited to math problems. "People's persistence drops," said University of California, Los Angeles assistant professor Rachit Dubey, a computational cognitive scientist who coauthored the study alongside peers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, and the University of Oxford, in an interview with *Futurism*. "Once the AI is taken away from people, it's not that people are just giving wrong answers. They're also not willing to try without AI." One bright spot: how participants used AI appeared to make a difference for individual outcomes, according to the research. Those who self-reported that they essentially prompted the chatbot to cough up the answers unsurprisingly had a worse time once the AI rug was pulled. Participants who instead said that they asked the chatbot for hints or clarification — as opposed to outright cheating — appeared to be better off sans AI assistance. Dubey is concerned that leaning too heavily on chatbots to replace cognitive labor could cause people to become more impatient, and even create the conditions for over-reliance on AI to function like an addiction. Most of all, though, he says he worries about how AI reliance will transform individuals' sense of confidence and worth as they struggle to think through problems independently. "The most important thing I learned in college is the value of hard work... if I work hard, I'm capable of doing a lot of things," Dubey reflected, noting that schools and communities should think very carefully about "blindly" integrating chatbots into educational programs. "These are very important core human elements that we learned throughout our childhood, in high school and college years." "If we're offloading to AI at scale for everything and anything, what will it do to our own beliefs about our own selves?" Dubey continued, adding that "practice makes you better in many domains, and that's what AI will take away from you... that's what I'm most worried about. We will have a generation of learners and people who will not know what they're capable of, and then that will really dilute human innovation and creativity." And as the researchers seek to expand their research into longer-term experiments, they're challenging folks across industries to "think about optimizing not just what people can do with AI," as they write in the study, "but what they can do without it." **More on AI and cognition:** *[College Students Losing Ability to Participate in Class Discussions Due to Offloading Their Thinking to AI]()* ## Author At Futurism, I've reported extensively on the rise of AI as a cultural and business force shaping the media industry, and more broadly how those dynamics are changing how we all consume and share information and relate to one another. I'm also fascinated by public health policy and ethics, the role of emerging tech in politics and governance — and the powerful people and forces at those intersections — climate change, and the environment. My investigation on Sports Illustrated's use of AI-generated authors with fictional biographies won a 2024 Mirror Award for "Best Story on Media Coverage of Artificial Intelligence in Journalism and the Media" from Syracuse University's SI Newhouse School, I contributed to Niemen Lab's 2025 Predictions for Journalism series, and I've discussed my work for Futurism during appearances on NPR, CNN, the BBC, the CBC, and more. I grew up in rural Pennsylvania and attended the University of Massachusetts Amherst, where I played Division I field hockey for the Minutewomen as a midfielder. Since then, I've lived in New Orleans, Louisiana and Manhattan, New York. I spend my free time running, reading, perusing archival fashion, and searching for the world’s best negroni. I also have a debonair tuxedo cat, Westley, who's named after "The Princess Bride." ### Author social links [Bluesky]()