---
title: "If the AI Industry Fails, It Could Take the Rest of Us Down With It"
description: "If current trends continue, corporate leaders could drag the economy into a self-imposed productivity slowdown to make AI look good."
date: "2025-09-10"
modified: "2025-09-10"
authors:
  - name: "Joe Wilkins"
    job_title: "Correspondent"
    link: "https://futurism.com/authors/jwilkins"
url: "https://futurism.com/ai-economy-industry-hype"
categories:
  - "Artificial Intelligence"
  - "Finance"
  - "Future Society"
tags:
  - "ai bubble"
  - "ai hype"
  - "economy"
---

# If the AI Industry Fails, It Could Take the Rest of Us Down With It

![If current trends continue, corporate leaders could drag the economy into a self-imposed productivity slowdown to make AI look good.](<https://futurism.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/ai-economy-industry-hype.jpg>)
*\<em\>Image: Getty / Futurism\</em\>*

Don't let AI critics tell you it's good for nothing: the amount of money being spent on AI infrastructure is so enormous that it’s literally [propping up the US economy](<https://futurism.com/ai-bubble-economy-bleak>).

The drawback, of course, is that if the AI industry fails, it could drag the [rest of the economy down with it](<https://futurism.com/ai-bubble-pops-entire-economy>).

In 2024, the S&P 500 grew by an incredible 24 percent — what the investment firm [Charles Schwab understatedly called](<https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/it-was-very-good-year>) a "very good year." Since 2023, nearly [half the growth](<https://finance.yahoo.com/news/magnificent-seven-stocks-dominate-p-180221332.html>) was clustered in just a handful of tech stocks known as the "magnificent seven": Meta, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Nvidia, Tesla, and Apple.

And as the [*Atlantic* recently noted](<https://www.theatlantic.com/economy/archive/2025/09/ai-bubble-us-economy/684128/>), the companies most heavily involved in the AI boom have yet to see that success manifest in anywhere except the stock market.

Though Meta, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Tesla are expected to have spent some $560 billion on AI development by the beginning of next year, their collective revenue from AI comes in at a paltry $35 billion. In the first half of 2025, the *Atlantic* notes, business spending on AI added more to GDP growth in the United States than all consumer spending combined.

This revenue gap is the key crisis facing the tech industry — and the broader economy — in their quest to build an AI future. Thanks to roundly [horrible performance](<https://futurism.com/companies-hiring-humans-fix-ai>) in actual workplace environments, revenue [remains illusive](<https://futurism.com/ai-agents-failing-companies>) for the vast majority of AI deployments.

Still, managers across industries are being pressured to show financial gains from the tech, even when the software isn’t delivering. That’s causing companies to do some [creative accounting](<https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/07/03/microsoft-lays-off-the-staff-who-make-the-money-to-fund-ai-that-doesnt/>) with their staff, [laying off workers](<https://futurism.com/engineer-ai-job-automation>) or [slowing down hiring](<https://fortune.com/2025/09/08/pwc-uk-chief-cutting-entry-level-junior-gen-z-jobs-ai-economic-headwinds-like-amazon-salesforce/>) to inflate AI’s numbers.

As the *Atlantic* highlights, this is leading to the very real possibility of a rupture forming in the broader economy, where companies induce rounds of layoffs to satisfy executives, without anything to show for it in the bottom line.

In other words, we’re barreling toward a future where unemployment could rise while productivity takes a nosedive — dramatically slowing the economy as a result.

That scenario isn’t exactly unprecedented. The computer boom of the 1980s took a similar turn, when [early email software](<https://hbr.org/2016/02/a-modest-proposal-eliminate-email>) prompted executives to lay off secretaries and typists, resulting in specialized white collar workers actually spending more time sending emails than on their typical roles.

"Email was one of those technologies that made us feel more productive but actually did the opposite," computer scientist Cal Newport told the *Atlantic*. "I worry we may be headed down the same path with AI."

There’s just one crucial difference**:** email isn’t propping up half the stock market.

**More on economics:** [*Microloan Apps May Be Poised to Destroy the Economy*](<https://futurism.com/microloan-apps-economy>)

## Author
At Futurism, I focus on the intersection of technology and power — examining the economics, history, and politics behind today’s dystopian headlines. As a writer, I’m interested in topics ranging from AI’s impact on labor to startups nobody asked for. My prior work includes bylines in Jacobin, Verso, and Blue Labyrinths. My work for Futurism has been cited by publications including Forbes, The Guardian, MIT Technology Review, Time, The Nation, Mother Jones, The Verge, and Wired. I grew up in Michigan, attending Central Michigan University as well as Ball State University, where I earned a master of music. I now live in Brooklyn with my girlfriend and our cat Ziti. On weekends, you can find me hunched over a cold pint arguing geopolitics with the other transplants.

### Author social links  
[Bluesky](<https://bsky.app/profile/joeonhere.bsky.social>)